Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Successful mood repair in the laboratory predicts successful mood repair in daily life for typical but not for depression-prone young adults

Bibliographic Data

ID15408335
AuthorsShimrit Dache (0000-0002-8328-4699, Bar-Ilan University, corresponding author), Andrew J Seidman (0000-0002-3218-4604, Brooklyn College), Lauren M Bylsma (0000-0003-3828-1760, University of Pittsburgh), Charles J George (0009-0009-2659-9203, University of Pittsburgh), Enikö Kiss (0000-0001-9896-370X, University of Szeged), Krisztina Kapornai (University of Szeged), Ildikó Baji (0000-0002-6698-3594, Vadaskert Alapítvány a Gyermekek Lelki Egészségéért), Maria Kovàcs (0000-0001-5274-5045, University of Pittsburgh)
Year2025
Volume25
Issue5
Pages1349-1359
Publication date2025-02-18
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueEmotion (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 1528-3542 • E-ISSN: 1931-1516
PublisherAmerican Psychological Association (PUBLISHER • US)
DOI10.1037/emo0001469
PMID39964536
OpenAlexW4407703887
LanguageEN

Successful mood repair (i.e., attenuating sad, dysphoric affect) is a critical form of emotion regulation that is necessary for healthy functioning. Laboratory-based studies have examined how well individuals can reduce sadness and how this process is affected by psychopathology like depression and cognitive mechanisms like attentional control. However, the extent to which laboratory-based findings inform about the regulation of sadness in daily life is unknown. To examine the ecological validity of laboratory-based mood repair paradigms, we compared mood repair success in the laboratory and daily life (assessed via ecological momentary assessment) among young adults remitted from depression ( n = 126) and those never depressed ( n = 104). Participants completed an experimental mood repair task followed by a 7-day ecological momentary assessment protocol during which they reported the responses they used to regulate sadness throughout the day. We expected that history of diagnosed depression and attentional control (assessed via a self-report questionnaire) would moderate the relationship between mood repair success in the two settings. Overall, more successful mood repair in the laboratory predicted more successful mood repair in daily life, supporting the ecological validity of laboratory-based information about affective processes. Depression history (but not attentional control) moderated this relationship: Mood repair in the laboratory predicted mood repair in daily life among never-depressed participants, while the association was only at a trend level among those with remitted depression. Thus, the findings raise questions about how the laboratory-based mood repair performance of depression-prone individuals can inform depression-focused conceptual and treatment development. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved)

Depression (economics · Developmental psychology · Mood · Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development · Clinical Psychology · Early Childhood Education and Development · Psychology

Citation velocityhistorical
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae