Training reduces error in rating the intensity of emotions
Datos Bibliográficos
| ID | 15408557 |
|---|---|
| Autores | Brian T Leitzke (0000-0002-3887-5860, autor de correspondencia), Rista C Plate (0000-0003-4754-2459), Seth D Pollak (0000-0001-5184-9846) |
| Año | 2020 |
| Volumen | 22 |
| Número | 3 |
| Páginas | 479-492 |
| Fecha de publicación | 2020-06-29 |
| Peer Reviewed | Sí |
| Open Access | Sí |
| Tipo | ARTICLE |
| Revista | Emotion (JOURNAL) |
| Identificadores de la revista | ISSN: 1528-3542 • E-ISSN: 1931-1516 |
| Editorial | American Psychological Association (PUBLISHER • US) |
| DOI | 10.1037/emo0000763 |
| PMID | 32597672 |
| OpenAlex | W3038006992 |
| Idioma | EN |
| Referencias citadas | 18 |
The ability to recognize how another is feeling is a critical skill, with profound implications for social adaptation. Training programs designed to improve social functioning typically attempt to direct attention toward or away from certain facial configurations, or to improve discrimination between emotions by categorizing faces. However, emotion recognition involves processes in addition to attentional orienting or categorical labeling. The intensity with which someone is experiencing an emotion is also influential; knowing whether someone is annoyed or enraged will guide an observer's response. Here, we systematically examined a novel paradigm designed to improve ratings of facial information communicating emotion intensity in a sample of 492 participants across a series of 8 studies. In Study 1, participants improved precision in recognizing the intensity of facial cues through personalized corrective feedback. These initial findings were replicated in a randomized-control trial comparing training with feedback to viewing and rating faces without feedback. Studies 2 and 3 revealed that these effects generalize to identities and facial configurations not included in the training. Study 4 indicated that the effects were sustained beyond the training session. These findings suggest that individualized, corrective feedback is effective for reducing error in rating the intensity of facial cues. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2022 APA, all rights reserved)
Categorical variable · Cognitive psychology · Corrective Feedback · Facial expression · Feeling · MEDLINE · Psychotherapist · PsycINFO · Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes · Communication · Computer Science · Mental Health Research Topics · Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies · Psychology · Social Psychology
Selective attention and emotional vulnerability
Social Information-Processing Mechanisms in Reactive and Proactive Aggression
Mechanisms of attentional biases towards threat in anxiety disorders
Attentional bias in addictive behaviors
An Integrated Model of Emotion Processes and Cognition in Social Information Processing
Toward a psychology of Homo sapiens
Most people are not Weird
Heterogeneity of long-history migration predicts emotion recognition accuracy
Perceptions of emotion from facial expressions are not culturally universal
A negativity bias for ambiguous facial-expression valence during childhood
Motivation sharpens exogenous spatial attention
Valence Focus and the Perception of Facial Affect
A review of current evidence for the causal impact of attentional bias on fear and anxiety
The nonverbal expression of pride
Sex differences in emotion
Recognizing spontaneous facial expressions of emotion in a small-scale society of Papua New Guinea
Emotional Expressions Reconsidered
Not all emotions are created equal
| Velocidad de citación | historical |
|---|---|
| Altamente citado | No |