The OECD Water Governance Principles in Flood Risk Management
Understanding Conflicts and Frictions in Dutch Flood Protection
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 15445297 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Nadine Keller (0000-0001-7220-8976, Consultant and Stakeholder Manager, Sweco, Netherlands [email protected], corresponding author), Barbara Tempels (0000-0002-0017-9341, Wageningen University & Research), Thomas Hartmann (0000-0001-6707-7174, TU Dortmund University) |
| Year | 2022 |
| Volume | 17 |
| Issue | 3 |
| Pages | 314-336 |
| Publication date | 2022-09-19 |
| Open Access | No |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Nature and Culture (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 1558-6073 • E-ISSN: 1558-5468 |
| Publisher | Berghahn Books (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.3167/nc.2022.170304 |
| OpenAlex | W4296285607 |
| Language | EN |
The OECD Water Governance Principles provide a guideline for good water governance. However, these principles can conflict with each other when applied in practice. This contribution aims to understand which dilemmas arise and how such conflicts play out. It is explored in an in-depth case study on Dutch flood risk management in which conflicts between the principles emerge when applied to flood risk management practice. Interviews with water managers were used to collect data on which principles contradict each other and how these conflicts work out in practice. The study reveals that although the principles seem obvious, some principles indeed clash when applying them, while others do not lead to conflicts. Principles on efficiency, trust, and engagement have high potential for conflicts
Business · Conflict management · Corporate governance · Economics · Environmental planning · Environmental resource management · Flood myth · Flood risk management · Geography · Guideline · Political science · Public relations · Risk management · Work (physics · Engineering · European and International Law Studies · Flood Risk Assessment and Management · Law · Water resources management and optimization
| Highly cited | No |
|---|