Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Does Direct-to-Consumer Personal Genetic Testing Improve Gynecological Cancer Screening Uptake among Never-Screened Attendees? A Randomized Controlled Study

Bibliographic Data

ID15460383
AuthorsMiki Watanabe (0000-0003-0222-9629, Nagoya City University), Satoyo Hosono (0000-0003-2569-0127, Nagoya City University, corresponding author), Hiroko Nakagawa‐Senda (0000-0003-0845-0279, Nagoya City University), Hiroko Nakagawa-Senda (Department of Public Health, Nagoya City University Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Nagoya 467-8601, Japan), Sachiyo Yamamoto (Okazaki City Hospital), Masami Aoyama (Health Promotion Division, Okazaki City Public Health Center, Okazaki 444-8545, Japan), Satoru Hattori (Okazaki City Hospital), Tamaki Yamada (0000-0002-8907-7041, Okazaki City Hospital), Sadao Suzuki (0000-0001-5988-4849, Nagoya City University)
Year2021
Volume18
Issue23
Pages12333-12333
Publication date2021-11-24
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueInternational Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 1661-7827 • E-ISSN: 1660-4601
PublisherMultidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute (PUBLISHER • CH)
DOI10.3390/ijerph182312333
PMID34886058
OpenAlexW3216288464
LanguageEN
References cited19

The clinical impact of direct-to-consumer genetic testing (DTC-GT) on health behavior change has remained controversial. The aim of this study is to clarify the short-term effects of DTC-GT on gynecological cancer screening uptake among middle-aged never-screened Japanese women in a randomized controlled trial (RCT). A total of 144 women aged 45-50 who had never undergone gynecological cancer screening were randomly selected to receive health education (control group), or health education and DTC-GT (intervention group), at a 1:1 ratio. We compared the gynecological screening uptake during the follow-up period. Furthermore, to estimate the impact of learning of an elevated genetic cancer risk in the intervention group, we conducted an analysis dichotomized by genetic risk category. A total of 139 women completed the one-year follow-up survey (69 in the control group and 70 in the intervention group). The follow-up period did not differ between control and intervention groups (the median follow-up period was 276 days and 279 days, respectively, p = 0.746). There were 7 (9.7%) women in the control group and 10 (13.9%) in the intervention group who attended breast cancer screening ( p = 0.606), and 9 (12.5%) women from both groups attended cervical cancer screening ( p = 1.000). Likewise, there were no significant differences in cancer screening uptake in the analysis stratified by risk category within the intervention group. In conclusion, there was no significant effect of DTC-GT on gynecological cancer screening uptake in this RCT setting. Increasing cancer screening attendance may require a combination of well-established intervention strategies and DTC-GT. Clinical Trial Registration: UMIN-CTR Identifier, UMIN000031709

Breast cancer · Cancer · Cancer prevention · Cancer screening · Cervical cancer · Gynecology · Health education · Intervention (counseling · Physical therapy · Public health · Randomized controlled trial · BRCA gene mutations in cancer · Global Cancer Incidence and Screening · Medicine · Nursing · Nutrition, Genetics, and Disease · Internal Medicine

  • The theory of planned behavior

    Open Access•Icek Ajzen•Organizational Behavior and Human…•1991

Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae