Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Considering the Potential Health Impacts of Electric Scooters

An Analysis of User Reported Behaviors in Provo, Utah

Bibliographic Data

ID15460825
AuthorsJeffrey Glenn (0000-0001-7989-3435, Brigham Young University, corresponding author), Madeline Bluth (Brigham Young University), Mannon Christianson (Brigham Young University), Jaymie Pressley (Brigham Young University), Austin Taylor (Community and Neighborhood Services Department, City of Provo, Provo, UT 84601, USA), Gregory S Macfarlane (0000-0003-3999-7584, Brigham Young University), Robert A Chaney (0000-0001-7330-7503, Brigham Young University)
Year2020
Volume17
Issue17
Pages6344-6344
Publication date2020-08-31
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueInternational Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 1661-7827 • E-ISSN: 1660-4601
PublisherMultidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute (PUBLISHER • CH)
DOI10.3390/ijerph17176344
PMID32878295
OpenAlexW3082896567
LanguageEN
Citations received7
References cited32

Electric scooters (e-scooters) are an increasingly popular form of transportation in urban areas. While research on this topic has focused primarily on injuries, there are multiple mechanisms by which e-scooter share programs may impact health. The aim of this study is to explore the health-related behaviors of e-scooter users and to discuss their implications for public health. Data were collected using an online survey emailed to registered e-scooter users. A total of 1070 users completed the survey. Descriptive variable statistics and chi-squared analysis were performed to determine variable dependent relationships and equality of proportions. The most common destinations reported were "just riding around for fun", home, and dining/shopping. The two most common modes of transportation that would have been used if e-scooters were not available were walking (43.5%) and using a personal vehicle (28.5%). Riding behavior was equally mixed between on the street, on the sidewalk, and equal amounts of both. e-Scooters in Provo are likely having both positive (e.g., air pollution) and negative impacts on health (e.g., injuries, physical inactivity). Future research should further explore patterns of e-scooter use and explicitly examine the linkages between e-scooters and areas of health beyond just injuries

Advertising · Business · Descriptive statistics · Environmental health · Injury prevention · Occupational safety and health · Poison control · Public health · Statistics · Suicide prevention · Transport engineering · Applied Psychology · Engineering · Human Factors and Ergonomics · Mathematics · Medicine · Noise Effects and Management · Nursing · Psychology · Traffic and Road Safety · Urban Transport and Accessibility

  • Footprints of the Future

    Open Access•Omer Kaya•ISPRS International Journal of…•2025

  • Optimization of Shared Electric Scooter Deployment Stations Based on Distance Tolerance

    Open Access•Jianwei Yue, Yingqiu Long et al.•ISPRS International Journal of…•2024

  • Sustainable E-scooter parking operation in urban areas using fuzzy Dombi based Rafsi model

    Open Access•Muhammet Deveci, Ilgın Gökaşar et al.•Sustainable Cities and Society•2023

  • Factors that influence women's loyalty to the use of bicycles and electric scooters from a gender perspective

    Open Access•Paula Andrea Rodríguez Correa, María Camila Bermeo-Giraldo et al.•Transportation•2025

  • Identification of the Mechanical Failure Factors with Potential Influencing Road Accidents in Ecuador

    Open Access•Juan Pablo Montero Salgado, Jose Muñoz-Sanz et al.•International Journal of…•2022

  • Public Health-Led Insights on Electric Micro-mobility Adoption and Use

    Open Access•Alexandra Bretones Diaz, Alexandra Bretones et al.•Journal of Urban Health•2023

  • Health impacts of electric micromobility transitions in Barcelona

    Open Access•Inés López-Dóriga, Guillem Vich et al.•Environmental Impact Assessment…•2022

  • Global, regional, and national comparative risk assessment of 79 behavioural, environmental and occupational, and metabolic risks or clusters of risks in 188 countries, 1990–2013

    Open Access•Mohammad H Forouzanfar, Lily Alexander et al.•The Lancet•2015

  • Gender differences in recreational and transport cycling

    Open Access•Kristiann C Heesch, Shannon Sahlqvist et al.•International Journal of…•2012

  • Global, regional, and national comparative risk assessment of 79 behavioural, environmental and occupational, and metabolic risks or clusters of risks, 1990–2015

    Open Access•Mohammad H Forouzanfar, Ashkan Afshin et al.•The Lancet•2016

  • Rethinking the links between social exclusion and transport disadvantage through the lens of social capital

    Open Access•Tim Schwanen, Kate Lucas et al.•Transportation Research Part A…•2015

  • Understanding spatio-temporal heterogeneity of bike-sharing and scooter-sharing mobility

    Open Access•Ruxin Zhu, Rui Zhu et al.•Computers Environment and Urban…•2020

  • Are e-scooters polluters? The environmental impacts of shared dockless electric scooters

    Open Access•Joseph Hollingsworth, Brenna Copeland et al.•Environmental Research Letters•2019

  • Electric Scooters

    Peyton L Nisson, Eric Ley et al.•American Journal of Public Health•2020

  • The Integration of Electric Scooters

    Rachel L Choron, Joseph V Sakran•American Journal of Public Health•2019

Citations per year1.75
Citation span2022 - 2025 (4)
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae