Adaptation and Psychometric Validation of the Empower-Sustain Usability Questionnaire (E-SUQ) among Patients with Metabolic Syndrome in Primary Care
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 15463555 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Nurul Hidayatullaila Sahar (Universiti Teknologi MARA), Siti Fatimah Badlishah-Sham (0000-0003-3001-7447, Universiti Teknologi MARA), Anis Safura Ramli (0000-0002-9517-1413, Hospital Sungai Buloh, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2021 |
| Volume | 18 |
| Issue | 17 |
| Pages | 9405-9405 |
| Publication date | 2021-09-06 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 1661-7827 • E-ISSN: 1660-4601 |
| Publisher | Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute (PUBLISHER • CH) |
| DOI | 10.3390/ijerph18179405 |
| PMID | 34502011 |
| OpenAlex | W3196469164 |
| Language | EN |
| References cited | 39 |
Self-management support is one of the most important components of the Chronic Care Model (CCM). The EMPOWER-SUSTAIN Global Cardiovascular Risks Self-Management Booklet © was developed for patients with Metabolic Syndrome (MetS), inspired by the CCM. Assessing usability of a self-management tool is important in chronic disease management. However, there was no available instrument to assess usability of a self-management booklet, as most instruments were developed to assess usability of mobile application. Therefore, this study aimed to adapt Skala Kebolehgunaan Aplikasi Mudah Alih (SKAMA) into the EMPOWER-SUSTAIN Usability Questionnaire (E-SUQ) and to determine its validity and reliability in assessing usability of a self-management booklet. A cross-sectional validation study was conducted among patients with MetS attending a university primary care clinic in Selangor, Malaysia. Content validation, adaptation and face validation of E-SUQ were performed according to recommended guidelines. It underwent two rounds of content validation as major revision was required for item 5. Subsequently, the revised E-SUQ was face-validated by 10 participants. Psychometric evaluation was conducted using principal component analysis with varimax rotation to determine the underlying structure of E-SUQ. Internal consistency reliability was assessed using Cronbach's α coefficient and the test-retest reliability was assessed using intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC (2,k)). A total of 205 patients participated in the study. The item-level content-validity-index (I-CVI) for item 5 improved from 0.57 to 1.0 after the second round of content validation. The final S-CVI/Ave value for ESUQ was >0.90. The item-level face-validity-index (I-FVI) ranged between 0.9 and 1.0. Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin value of 0.871 and Bartlett's test of sphericity p -value of 1 were extracted according to the Kaiser's Criteria. The two extracted factors explained 60.6% of the cumulative percentage of variance. The elbow of the scree plot occurred between the second and third component, suggesting two factors to be retained. The two factors were consistent with "Positive" and "Negative" tone model. The overall Cronbach's α coefficient was 0.77, indicating good internal reliability. The overall ICC was 0.85, indicating good reproducibility. The E-SUQ is shown to be valid, reliable and stable to measure the usability of a self-management booklet among patients with MetS in a university primary care clinic in Malaysia
Content validity · Cronbach's alpha · Face validity · Human–computer interaction · Intraclass correlation · Psychometrics · Reliability (semiconductor · Usability · Varimax rotation · Applied Psychology · Clinical Psychology · Computer Science · Diabetes Management and Education · Health Education and Validation · Medicine · Mobile Health and mHealth Applications · Psychology
Principles of Good Practice for the Translation and Cultural Adaptation Process for Patient-Reported Outcomes (PRO) Measures
Improving Primary Care for Patients With Chronic Illness
An Empirical Evaluation of the System Usability Scale
Current Concepts in Validity and Reliability for Psychometric Instruments
Improving Chronic Illness Care
Design and Implementation Content Validity Study
Is the CVI an acceptable indicator of content validity? Appraisal and recommendations
Harmonizing the Metabolic Syndrome
Content validity in psychological assessment
Perceived e‐service quality (PeSQ)
Determination and Quantification Of Content Validity
The reliability of a two-item scale
The content validity index
A Guideline of Selecting and Reporting Intraclass Correlation Coefficients for Reliability Research
Factor Analytic Evidence for the Construct Validity of Scores
Comparative fit indexes in structural models
| Citation velocity | historical |
|---|---|
| Highly cited | No |