Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Environmental Acceptability of Geotechnical Composites from Recycled Materials

Comparative Study of Laboratory and Field Investigations

Bibliographic Data

ID15464124
AuthorsMarija Đurić (0000-0001-5285-6730, Jožef Stefan International Postgraduate School), Vesna Zalar Serjun (0000-0003-1658-2466, Slovenian National Building and Civil Engineering Institute), Ana Mladenović (0000-0001-9571-1574, Slovenian National Building and Civil Engineering Institute), Alenka Mauko Pranjić (0000-0002-9822-7806, Slovenian National Building and Civil Engineering Institute), Radmila Milačić (0000-0002-5751-4059, Jožef Stefan Institute), Janez Ščančar (0000-0002-8018-1715, Jožef Stefan Institute), Janko Urbanc (0000-0002-6192-646X, Geological Survey of Slovenia), Nina Mali (0009-0003-5869-4965, Geological Survey of Slovenia), Alenka Pavlin (Termit d.d., Drtija 51, 1251 Moravče, Slovenia), Janez Turk (0000-0003-4949-2790, Slovenian National Building and Civil Engineering Institute), Primož Oprčkal (0000-0002-6930-2571, Slovenian National Building and Civil Engineering Institute, corresponding author)
Year2023
Volume20
Issue3
Pages2014-2014
Publication date2023-01-21
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueInternational Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 1661-7827 • E-ISSN: 1660-4601
PublisherMultidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute (PUBLISHER • CH)
DOI10.3390/ijerph20032014
PMID36767380
OpenAlexW4317726945
LanguageEN
References cited30

The environmental properties of three geotechnical composites made by recycling wastes were investigated on a laboratory scale and in the field with the use of lysimeters designated for the revitalization of degraded mining sites. Composites were prepared by combining the mine waste with paper-mill sludge and foundry sand (Composite 1), with digestate from municipal waste and paper ash (Composite 2), and with coal ash, foundry slag and waste incineration bottom ash (Composite 3). The results of laboratory leaching tests proved that Composites 1 and 3 are environmentally acceptable, according to the legislative limits, as the potentially hazardous substances were immobilized, while in Composite 2, the legislative limits were exceeded. In the field lysimeters, the lowest rate of leaching was determined for optimally compacted Composites 1 and 3, while for Composite 2 the leaching of Cu was high. This study proved that optimally installed Composites 1 and 3 are environmentally acceptable for use in construction as an alternative to virgin materials, for the revitalization of degraded mining sites or, along with Composite 2, for closure operations with landfills. In this way, locally available waste streams are valorised and channelized into a beneficial and sustainable recycling practice

Bottom ash · Composite material · Composite number · Fly ash · Geotechnical engineering · Hazardous waste · Incineration · Leachate · Leaching (pedology · Lysimeter · Municipal solid waste · Soil water · Waste management · Concrete and Cement Materials Research · Engineering · Environmental Science · Materials Science · Recycled Aggregate Concrete Performance · Recycling and utilization of industrial and municipal waste in materials production

Citation velocityhistorical
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae