Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Portuguese Older Persons’ Views about Living in a Nursing Home

Challenges to the Rehabilitation of the Image of LTC in Post-Pandemic Times

Bibliographic Data

ID15464167
AuthorsRute Lemos (0000-0003-2254-7923, Universidade do Porto), Alexandra Lopes (0000-0002-4584-5563, Universidade do Porto, corresponding author), Isabel Días (0000-0002-7033-0502, Universidade do Porto), Henrique Barros (0000-0003-4699-6571, Universidade do Porto)
Year2022
Volume19
Issue17
Pages10566-10566
Publication date2022-08-24
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueInternational Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 1661-7827 • E-ISSN: 1660-4601
PublisherMultidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute (PUBLISHER • CH)
DOI10.3390/ijerph191710566
PMID36078281
OpenAlexW4292999061
LanguageEN
Citations received3
References cited28

This paper addresses the broad topic of what older people think about nursing homes in Portugal. In the aftermath of the COVID-19 pandemic and considering the tragic events taking place in nursing homes, the challenge of reimagining the sector involves not only improving procedures and models of care, making sure they meet what citizens consider adequate, but also rehabilitating the image people have about nursing homes and rebuilding trust. Current and future decisions about how one meets LTC needs is influenced by the extent to which individuals see the alternatives as adequate. The paper presents evidence collected from a qualitative study run just before the COVID-19 pandemic began, with a sample of 45 community-dwelling individuals aged 60 plus, in Portugal. Opinions and views about nursing homes were collected and the results point to enduring negative aspects that are considered at odds with what constitutes adequate care. The paper discusses in length what those aspects are and concludes that future reforms of the nursing homes sector in Portugal need to consider what current and future users think and feel about that specific type of service. Debates in Portugal tend to be more focused on discussions about expanding the sector and less on aspects of quality of care. Views and opinions of interviewed participants, however, suggest that people may be more worried about quality of care

Business · Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19 · Disease · Logistic regression · Long-term care · Nursing homes · Odds · Pandemic · Political science · Portuguese · Public relations · Quality (philosophy · Quality of life (healthcare · Sample (material · Service (business · Sociology · Aging, Elder Care, and Social Issues · Elder Abuse and Neglect · Geriatric Care and Nursing Homes · Medicine · Nursing · Psychology · Gerontology · Marketing · Rehabilitation

  • Revisiting the “Care Penalty” in the Portuguese Labor Market

    Open Access•Viktoria Szenkurök, Ricardo Rodrigues•Gender Work and Organization•2026

  • Exploring Dementia-Friendly Environments in Long-Term Care Facilities

    Sara Alves, Natália Duarte et al.•Journal of Aging and Environment•2024

  • We’re going to tie you to the chair

    Open Access•Isabel Días, Henrique Barros et al.•Sociologia Problemas e Práticas•2024

  • Elder Abuse

    Karl Pillemer, David Burnes et al.•The Gerontologist•2016

  • Getting to the Truth

    Open Access•Kristina Orfali•The Hastings Center Report•2021

  • Abuse of Older Persons With Dementia

    Open Access•Boye Fang, Elsie Yan•Trauma Violence & Abuse•2018

  • Stated preferences for long-term care

    Open Access•THOMAS LEHNERT, MAX HEUCHERT et al.•Ageing and Society•2019

  • Structural discrimination and abuse

    Open Access•Jonathan Parker•The Journal of Adult Protection•2021

  • That's not my Robert! Identity maintenance and other warrants in family members' claims about mistreatment in old-age care

    Open Access•Tove Harnett, Håkan Jönson•Ageing and Society•2010

  • Does the Family Care Best? Ideals of Care in a Familialistic Care Regime - Erratum

    Open Access•Selma Kadi, Ricardo Rodrigues et al.•Journal of Social Policy•2024

Unique citing works3
Citations per year1,5
Citation span2024 - 2026 (3)
Citation velocitycurrent
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 2

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae