Keeping the Agenda Current
Evolution of Australian Lived Experience Mental Health Research Priorities
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 15464431 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Aidan Gulliver (0000-0001-6351-9844, Australian National University, corresponding author), Alyssa R Morse (0000-0001-6948-1082, Australian National University), Melanie Banfield (0000-0002-3024-1687, Australian National University, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2022 |
| Volume | 19 |
| Issue | 13 |
| Pages | 8101-8101 |
| Publication date | 2022-07-01 |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 1661-7827 • E-ISSN: 1660-4601 |
| Publisher | Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute (PUBLISHER • CH) |
| DOI | 10.3390/ijerph19138101 |
| PMID | 35805758 |
| OpenAlex | W4283777802 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 4 |
| References cited | 8 |
The value of including consumers' and carers' views at the early stages of study design is increasingly being recognised as essential to improving the relevance and quality of research. One method of achieving this is by actively seeking and regularly updating consumer and carer priorities for mental health research. The current study presents priorities for mental health research collected from two virtual World Cafés with consumers and carers ( n = 4, n = 7) held in 2021. Over 200 priorities were identified (13 themes, 64 subthemes), which were then compared with two combined data collection activities from 2013 (face-to-face forum; n = 25), and 2017 (online survey; n = 70). There appears to be some evolution in consumer and carer priorities over time. A key difference was that in the previous studies, mental health service issues were at the individual service delivery level, whereas in the current study, a broader focus was on mental health systems of care and issues around service funding, accessibility, and equity of access. It is possible these changes may also have resulted from key differences between the studies, including the methods, setting, and participants. Overall, similar to our previous studies no clear priorities were identified; however, a significant number of important research topics were identified by consumers and carers, providing a rich agenda from which to improve the management of mental health
Current (fluid · Environmental health · Environmental planning · Geography · Lived experience · Mental health · Political science · Psychiatry · Psychotherapist · Engineering · Health disparities and outcomes · Medicine · Mental Health and Patient Involvement · Mental Health Treatment and Access · Psychology
‘Keeping it real’
Developing a Research Agenda with Victim-Survivors to Improve Health Sector Responses to Domestic, Family and Sexual Violence in Australia
An Exploratory Study of Research Needed for the Improvement of Care and Services for Persons with a Lived Experience of Mental Health Challenges
Imagining Ontological Security
Choosing a Qualitative Research Approach
The answer is 17 years, what is the question
Australian mental health consumers’ priorities for research
Horizon 2020 Priorities in Clinical Mental Health Research
Virtual World Café Method for Identifying Mental Health Research Priorities
How to increase public participation in advance care planning
Australian Mental Health Consumer and Carer Perspectives on Ethics in Adult Mental Health Research
Using thematic analysis in psychology
| Citations per year | 2 |
|---|---|
| Citation span | 2024 - 2026 (3) |
| Highly cited | No |