Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Allograft and Collagen Membrane Augmentation Procedures Preserve the Bone Level around Implants after Immediate Placement and Restoration

Bibliographic Data

ID15465147
AuthorsRoni Kolerman (0000-0003-1798-9735, Tel Aviv University, corresponding author), Nayrouz Qahaz (Dentist, Kolerman Periodontal and Implant Clinic, Tel-Aviv 64389, Israel), Eitan Barnea (Prosthodontist, Implant and Prosthodontic Clinic, Tel-Aviv 64163, Israel), Eitan Mijiritsky (0000-0002-1661-7529, Tel Aviv University), Liat Chaushu (0000-0002-5755-7526, Tel Aviv University), Gavriel Chaushu (0000-0001-9176-4978, Tel Aviv University), Haim Tal (Tel Aviv University), Joseph Nissan (0000-0001-7290-4357, Tel Aviv University)
Year2020
Volume17
Issue4
Pages1133-1133
Publication date2020-02-11
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueInternational Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 1661-7827 • E-ISSN: 1660-4601
PublisherMultidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute (PUBLISHER • CH)
DOI10.3390/ijerph17041133
PMID32053928
OpenAlexW3005650138
LanguageEN
References cited37

Background: Immediate implant placement and restoration (IPR), is a reliable treatment modality . Purpose : This historical prospective study evaluated the medium-term outcomes of hard tissue after IPR in the anterior maxilla with simultaneous hard tissue augmentation. Methods: Seventy-three patients treated with single-implant IPR in the anterior maxilla were followed for 1-8 years. Treatment involved, atraumatic extraction, immediate implant placement and abutment adaptation, followed by simultaneous augmentation with mineralized freeze-dried bone allograft (FDBA) particles to fill the gaps and restore the ridge. The surgical site was stabilized with a resorbable collagen membrane, followed by the connection of an acrylic provisional restoration. Results: All implants osseointegrated during the follow-up period (mean, 34 ± 22 months). Radiographic evaluation of the distance between the implant shoulder (IS) and crestal bone level (CBL) was of 0.86 ± 0.86 mm and 0.8 ± 0.84 mm mesially and distally, respectively. Splitting the results into up to 3 years and 3-8 years of follow-up data, the corresponding values were 0.90 ± 0.83 and 0.68 ± 0.88 for the mesial aspect and 0.99 ± 0.87and 0.74 ± 0.83 for the distal aspect, respectively. Mean peri-implant probing depth was 3.63 mm (SD ± 1.06) and 16 implants (22%) presented at least one bleeding pocket of ≥5 mm (peri implant mucositis). Conclusions: The immediate replacement of a single maxillary tooth by implants combined with guided bone regeneration is a predictable treatment modality with favorable peri-implant bony response

Abutment · Bleeding on probing · Implant · Maxilla · Mucositis · Osseointegration · Periodontitis · Periosteum · Radiation therapy · Dental Implant Techniques and Outcomes · Dental Radiography and Imaging · Dentistry · Medicine · Periodontal Regeneration and Treatments · Surgery

Citation velocityhistorical
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOISci-HubOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae