Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Perceptions of the Covid-19 Pandemic among Women with Infertility

Correlations with Dispositional Optimism

Bibliographic Data

ID15465680
AuthorsAmanda J Dillard (0000-0002-1946-6420, Grand Valley State University, corresponding author), Ava E Weber (0000-0002-0122-9689, Grand Valley State University), Amanda Chassee (Reproductive Genomics Program, The Fertility Center, Grand Rapids, MI 49525, USA), Mili Thakur (0000-0003-3281-7085, Spectrum Health)
Year2022
Volume19
Issue5
Pages2577-2577
Publication date2022-02-23
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueInternational Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 1661-7827 • E-ISSN: 1660-4601
PublisherMultidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute (PUBLISHER • CH)
DOI10.3390/ijerph19052577
PMID35270268
OpenAlexW4213072790
LanguageEN
Citations received2
References cited38

People who are more optimistic may experience better psychological health during stressful times. The present study examined the perceptions and emotions surrounding the COVID-19 pandemic among American women who were experiencing fertility problems. We tested if dispositional optimism in these women was associated with less negative perceptions and emotions. We conducted a cross-sectional survey of patients from a single private infertility and reproductive clinic in an urban area in the Midwest, United States. Women, age 18 or older, primarily White and educated, who presented for an appointment to the clinic were invited to participate in an email-based survey. Respondents ( N = 304) reported their perceived impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on fertility treatment, emotions associated with this impact, and perceived stress and depressive symptoms. They also completed measures of dispositional optimism and expectations for a future pregnancy. Findings indicated that women perceived an overall negative impact of the pandemic on their treatment plans, which was associated with more negative emotions, lower expectations of future pregnancy, and greater stress and depressive symptoms during the pandemic. However, further correlational analyses revealed that being higher in trait optimism was associated with perceiving a less negative impact of the pandemic, experiencing fewer negative emotions, and less overall stress and depressive symptoms. Although women with fertility problems have perceived the pandemic as negative and disruptive, those who are higher in optimism may be less affected

Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19 · Cross-sectional study · Disease · Environmental health · Fertility · Infertility · Optimism · Pandemic · Population · Pregnancy · Clinical Psychology · COVID-19 Impact on Reproduction · Medicine · Optimism, Hope, and Well-being · Psychology · Reproductive Health and Technologies · Social Psychology

  • Resilience mediates the influence of hope, optimism, social support, and stress on anxiety severity among Chinese patients with cervical spondylosis

    Open Access•Yuying Chu, Yuqiang Zhang et al.•Frontiers in Psychiatry•2022

  • Effect of the Covid-19 pandemic on women’s fertility intentions and its policy implications for China and the rest of the world

    Tiantian Meng, Yongmei Zhang et al.•Biodemography and Social Biology•2023

  • Psychological impact of infertility

    Open Access•Tara M Cousineau, Alice D Domar•Best Practice & Research Clinical…•2007

  • Effects of optimism on psychological and physical well-being

    Open Access•Michael F Scheier, Charles S Carver•Cognitive Therapy and Research•1992

  • The Health Benefits of Writing about Life Goals

    Open Access•Laura A King•Personality and Social Psychology…•2001

  • Dispositional Optimism and Coping

    Open Access•L Solberg Nes, Suzanne C Segerstrom•Personality and Social Psychology…•2006

  • Dispositional optimism

    Open Access•Charles S Carver, Michael F Scheier•Trends in Cognitive Sciences•2014

  • Optimism and Physical Health

    Heather N Rasmussen, Michael F Scheier et al.•Annals of Behavioral Medicine•2009

  • Self-efficacy, social support and well-being

    Open Access•Evangelos C Karademas•Personality and Individual…•2006

  • Can psychological interventions increase optimism? A meta-analysis

    John M Malouff, Nicola S Schutte•The Journal of Positive Psychology•2017

  • The MOS 36-ltem Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36)

    John E Ware, Cathy Donald Sherbourne•Medical Care•1992

  • Prevalence of stress, anxiety, depression among the general population during the Covid-19 pandemic

    Open Access•Nader Salari, Amin Hosseinian-Far et al.•Globalization and Health•2020

  • Dispositional Optimism and Physical Well‐Being

    Open Access•Michael E Scheier, Charles S Carver•Journal of Personality•1987

  • Self‐Regulation Processes and Health

    Open Access•Heather N Rasmussen, Carsten Wrosch et al.•Journal of Personality•2006

  • The role of optimism in social network development, coping, and psychological adjustment during a life transition

    Ian Brissette, Michael F Scheier et al.•Journal of Personality and Social…•2002

  • Distinguishing optimism from neuroticism (and trait anxiety, self-mastery, and self-esteem)

    Michael F Scheier, Charles S Carver et al.•Journal of Personality and Social…•1994

  • Psychological Stress and the Human Immune System

    Suzanne C Segerstrom, Gale E Miller et al.•Psychological Bulletin•2004

  • A Global Measure of Perceived Stress

    Sheldon Cohen, Thomas W Kamarck et al.•Journal of Health and Social…•1983

Unique citing works2
Citations per year0.5
Citation span2022 - 2023 (2)
Citation velocityhistorical
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 2

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae