Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Carbon Sink Cost and Influence Factors Analysis in a National Afforestation Project under Different Investment Modes

Bibliographic Data

ID15466347
AuthorsXuexiang Li (0000-0002-9309-8259, Wuhan Business University), Wanlin Hu (Huazhong Agricultural University), Fan Zhang (0000-0002-3643-018X, Beijing Forestry University, corresponding author), Jinxin Zhang (0000-0002-6750-9640, Wuhan Business University, corresponding author), Sheng Feng (0000-0002-7709-8355, Center of Hubei Cooperative Innovation for Emissions Trading System), Feng SHENG (Hubei University), Xiangyu Xu (0000-0001-6248-9268, Institute of Plant Protection)
Year2022
Volume19
Issue13
Pages7738-7738
Publication date2022-06-24
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueInternational Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 1661-7827 • E-ISSN: 1660-4601
PublisherMultidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute (PUBLISHER • CH)
DOI10.3390/ijerph19137738
PMID35805402
OpenAlexW4283579355
LanguageEN
Citations received2
References cited19

Afforestation projects are the main source of carbon sink. Measurement and impact analysis of carbon sink costs will help accelerate the marketization of forestry carbon sink. Considering the opportunity cost of land use and the carbon release cost of wood products, this study proposed a forestry carbon sink cost model under the Public-Private Partnership (PPP) and the direct (DI) investment mode based on the classic carbon sink model. Then, the proposed models were applied to a real-world afforestation project, the 20-year national afforestation project (NAP) in Laohekou City, Hubei Province, China. With the help of the input-output forestry carbon sink cost-benefit analysis framework, the dynamic analysis of factors such as rotation period, timber price, discount rate and yield rate for forestry is carried out. Results show that: (1) with the increasing of rotation period, wood market price, and wood yield rate, the carbon sink cost of Laohekou NAP gradually decreases, while the discount rate has the opposite trend; (2) the DI mode is more feasible than the PPP model at the present condition. The PPP mode is more feasible than the DI mode only when the wood price is lower than 73.18% of the current price, the yield rate is lower than 0.485, and the discount rate is higher than 6.77%. (3) When choosing tree species for NAP, the carbon sink capacity, wood market price, maturity time, and planting cost should be synthetically considered. The proposed model and the obtained results can not only support local governments and forestry carbon sink enterprises to make tradeoffs between PPP and DI mode, but also provide them with useful information for reducing carbon sink costs

Afforestation · Agricultural economics · Agroforestry · Carbon accounting · Carbon dioxide · Carbon sequestration · Carbon sink · Climate change · Economics · Environmental economics · Greenhouse gas · Investment (military · Natural resource economics · Sink (geography · Climate Change Policy and Economics · Environmental Impact and Sustainability · Environmental Science · Forest Management and Policy · Ecology

  • From models to markets

    Open Access•Yan Niu, Xiaowen Wang et al.•Trees Forests and People•2025

  • China's National Reserve Forest Project contribution to carbon neutrality and path to profitability

    Open Access•Fan Zhang, Mo Li et al.•Forest Policy and Economics•2024

  • A Review of Forest Carbon Sequestration Cost Studies

    Open Access•Kenneth Richards, Kenneth R Richards et al.•Climatic Change•2004

  • Evaluating the impacts of a carbon tax on imported forest products—evidence from Taiwan

    Open Access•Ping‐Yu Chen, Ping-Yu Chen et al.•Forest Policy and Economics•2014

  • The experience of China's forest reforms

    Open Access•William F Hyde•Forest Policy and Economics•2018

  • Site identification for carbon sequestration in Latin America

    Open Access•Pablo C Benítez, Michael Obersteiner•Forest Policy and Economics•2005

Unique citing works2
Citations per year1
Citation span2024 - 2025 (2)
Citation velocityrecent
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 2

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae