Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Do Cervical Cancer Patients Diagnosed with Opportunistic Screening Live Longer? An Arkhangelsk Cancer Registry Study

Bibliographic Data

ID15466626
AuthorsElena Roik (0000-0001-7226-2198, Northern State Medical University, corresponding author), Evert Nieboer (0000-0001-5165-2832, McMaster University), Olga A Kharkova (0000-0002-3130-2920, Northern State Medical University), Andrej М Grjibovski (0000-0002-5464-0498, Ahmet Yesevi University), Vitaly A Postoev (0000-0003-4982-4169, Northern State Medical University), Jon Oyvind Odland (0000-0002-2756-0732, UiT The Arctic University of Norway)
Year2017
Volume14
Issue12
Pages1500-1500
Publication date2017-11-26
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueInternational Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 1661-7827 • E-ISSN: 1660-4601
PublisherMultidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute (PUBLISHER • CH)
DOI10.3390/ijerph14121500
PMID29186874
OpenAlexW2769983975
LanguageEN
References cited5

The aim of the current study was to compare cervical cancer (СС) patients diagnosed with and without screening in terms of: (i) sociodemographic and clinical characteristics; (ii) factors associated with survival; and (iii), and levels of risk. A registry-based study was conducted using data from the Arkhangelsk Cancer Registry. It included women with newly diagnosed malignant neoplasm of the uterine cervix during the period of 1 January 2005 to 11 November 2016 (N = 1548). The Kaplan-Meier method, the log-rank test, and Cox regression were applied. Most participants who were diagnosed by screening were at stage I and died less frequently from CC than those diagnosed without screening. The latter group was also diagnosed with СС at a younger age and died younger. Younger individuals and urban residents diagnosed with stage I and II, squamous cell carcinoma had longer survival times. Cox regression modeling indicated that the hazard ratio for death among women with CC diagnosed without screening was 1.61 (unadjusted) and 1.37 (adjusted). CC diagnosed by screening, cancer stage, patient residence, histological tumor type, and age at diagnosis were independent prognostic variables of longer survival time with CC. Diagnosis of CC made within a screening program improved survival

Cancer · Cancer registry · Cervical cancer · Cervix · Confidence interval · Gynecology · Hazard ratio · Proportional hazards model · Stage (stratigraphy · Survival analysis · Cervical Cancer and HPV Research · Endometrial and Cervical Cancer Treatments · Global Cancer Incidence and Screening · Medicine · Internal Medicine

  • Factors associated with non-attendance, opportunistic attendance and reminded attendance to cervical screening in an organized screening program

    Open Access•Bo T Hansen, Silje S Hukkelberg et al.•BMC Public Health•2011

  • Early cancer detection among rural and urban californians

    Open Access•Sarah L Blair, Georgia Robins Sadler et al.•BMC Public Health•2006

  • An Exploration of Urban and Rural Differences in Lung Cancer Survival Among Medicare Beneficiaries

    Lisa R Shugarman, Melony E Sorbero et al.•American Journal of Public Health•2008

  • Late-Stage Breast Cancer Diagnosis and Health Care Access in Illinois∗

    Fahui Wang, Sara Mclafferty et al.•The Professional Geographer•2008

Citation velocityhistorical
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOISci-HubOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae