Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Socio-Economic Drivers of Renewable Energy

Empirical Evidence from BRICS

Bibliographic Data

ID15466989
AuthorsUsman Mehmood (0000-0001-9034-5878, University of the Punjab, corresponding author), Ephraim Bonah Agyekum (0000-0002-6947-4349, Ural Federal University), Salman Tariq (0000-0002-9935-4516, University of the Punjab), Zia Ul Haq (0000-0002-2518-3451, University of the Punjab), Solomon Eghosa Uhunamure (0000-0002-8319-5143, Cape Peninsula University of Technology), Joshua N Edokpayi (0000-0002-2550-3988, University of Venda), Ayesha Azhar (0000-0001-7921-0016, University of the Punjab)
Year2022
Volume19
Issue8
Pages4614-4614
Publication date2022-04-11
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueInternational Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 1661-7827 • E-ISSN: 1660-4601
PublisherMultidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute (PUBLISHER • CH)
DOI10.3390/ijerph19084614
PMID35457479
OpenAlexW4223610765
LanguageEN
Citations received8
References cited40

There is a need to implement efficient strategies to mitigate the challenges of climate change and income inequalities in developing countries. Several studies have been conducted to address the relationship among different econometric and environmental indicators of renewable energy (RE) but overlooked the relationship between RE and income inequalities. This study investigates the influence of the distribution of income on the RE in Brazil, Russia, China, and South Africa (BRICS) between 1988 and 2017. The econometric (economic growth and trade), environmental, and institutional parameters are also integrated into the model. The outcomes reveal that reduced inequality in income distribution increases the consumption of RE. In contrast, CO 2 emissions have a positive correlation with RE. The governments should implement environmentally friendly policies and increase the consumption of renewable energy in the future with regards to reducing environmental pollution. Furthermore, findings from the study indicate a positive effect on the reduction of corruption in renewable energy. This shows that institutional quality can affect the uptake of renewable energy. The study further identified that growth in a country's economy decreases RE consumption, suggesting that these countries prefer fossil fuels to gain economic growth. The Granger causality results show that a bidirectional causality exists between income inequality and RE consumption. Bidirectional causality is observed between income distribution and CO 2 emissions. The results from this study are important for policymakers to achieve sustainable development because fair income distribution and environmental quality are considered as two key factors for sustainable development. Strong institutions and control on corruption can bring sound social and economic gains. Therefore, fair distribution of income and strong institutional policies can increase RE consumption to achieve a clean environment

Consumption (sociology · Distribution (mathematics · Econometric model · Econometrics · Economic growth · Economic inequality · Economics · Granger causality · Income distribution · Inequality · Kuznets Curve · Language change · Natural resource economics · Renewable energy · Sustainable development · Energy and Environment Impacts · Energy, Environment, and Transportation Policies · Energy, Environment, Economic Growth · Ecology

  • Modelling the dual impact of technological innovations and renewable energy investment on environmental quality and income inequality

    Open Access•Michael Provide Fumey, Samuel Duku Yeboah et al.•Sustainable Futures•2026

  • Do world uncertainty and income inequality moderate the efficacy of environmental innovation in driving global renewable energy generation

    Kashif Nesar Rather, Mantu Kumar Mahalik•International Journal of…•2024

  • Managing the SDG ‐Aligned Energy Transition in OECD Countries

    Open Access•Azad Erdem, Erick Okoth et al.•Sustainable Development•2026

  • Bridging inequality

    Open Access•Md Qamruzzaman, Aminul Hoque et al.•Sustainable Futures•2026

  • Bridging Inequality and Energy Transition

    Open Access•Rongrong Li, Qiang Wang et al.•Sustainable Development•2025

  • Utilities policy for the energy transition

    Open Access•Hasan Tutar, Dalia Streimikiene•Utilities Policy•2026

  • Relationship between Income and Mental Health during the Covid-19 Pandemic in China

    Open Access•Mingna Li, Bo Zhou et al.•International Journal of…•2022

  • Role of Research and Development Budgets and Socio-economic Conditions for Greener Energy Transition in Emerging Economies

    Open Access•Lu Pan, Fucheng Yang et al.•Politická ekonomie•2024

  • The Age of Sustainable Development

    Jeff Sachs, Jeffrey D Sachs et al.•The age of sustainable development•2015

  • Dynamic relationship between technological innovations, financial development, renewable energy, and ecological footprint

    Open Access•Muhammad Usman, Nesrine Hammar•Environmental Science and…•2021

  • Determinants of the Wage Share

    Open Access•Engelbert Stockhammer•British Journal of Industrial…•2017

  • Renewable energy consumption, CO2 emissions and oil prices in the G7 countries

    Open Access•Perry Sadorsky•Energy Economics•2009

  • Carbon emissions and income inequality

    Martin Ravallion•Oxford Economic Papers•2000

  • Renewable energy consumption and economic growth

    Open Access•Nicholas Apergis, James E Payne•Energy Policy•2010

  • Testing for Granger non-causality in heterogeneous panels

    Open Access•Elena-Ivona Dumitrescu, Christophe Hurlin•Economic Modelling•2012

  • Pooled Mean Group Estimation of Dynamic Heterogeneous Panels

    M Hashem Pesaran, Yongcheol Shin et al.•Journal of the American…•1999

  • Political instability, corruption and policy formation

    Open Access•Per G Fredriksson, J Svensson•Journal of Public Economics•2003

  • Political power and renewable energy futures

    Open Access•Mary Jean Burke, John C Stephens•Energy Research & Social Science•2018

  • Linking Economic Growth, Urbanization, and Environmental Degradation in China

    Open Access•Tomiwa Sunday Adebayo, Mary Oluwatoyin Agboola et al.•International Journal of…•2021

  • Dominance of Fossil Fuels in Japan’s National Energy Mix and Implications for Environmental Sustainability

    Open Access•Tomiwa Sunday Adebayo, Abraham Ayobamiji Awosusi et al.•International Journal of…•2021

  • Political and economic inequality and the environment

    Open Access•Lyle Scruggs, Lyle A Scruggs•Ecological Economics•1998

  • Income, inequality, and pollution

    Open Access•Mariano Torras, James K Boyce•Ecological Economics•1998

  • Mechanisms explaining the impact of economic inequality on environmental deterioration

    Open Access•Alexandre Berthe, Luc Elie•Ecological Economics•2015

  • Inequality as a cause of environmental degradation

    Open Access•James K Boyce•Ecological Economics•1994

  • Renewable energy injustice

    Open Access•Julius Alexander Mcgee, Patrick Trent Greiner•Energy Research & Social Science•2019

  • Inequality and the carbon intensity of human well-being

    Open Access•A K Jorgenson•Journal of Environmental Studies…•2015

  • The Standardized World Income Inequality Database

    Open Access•Frederick Solt•Social Science Quarterly•2016

  • Capital in the Twenty-First Century

    Open Access•Thomas Piketty•British Journal of Sociology•2014

Unique citing works8
Citations per year2
Citation span2022 - 2026 (5)
Citation velocitycurrent
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 8

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae