The Evidence Base for Wellness Recovery Action Planning (WRAP)
A Protocol for a Systematic Literature Review and Meta-Analysis
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 15467175 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Michael John Norton (0000-0002-7420-9339, University College Cork, corresponding author), Claire Flynn (Mental Health Ireland) |
| Year | 2021 |
| Volume | 18 |
| Issue | 24 |
| Pages | 13365-13365 |
| Publication date | 2021-12-19 |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 1661-7827 • E-ISSN: 1660-4601 |
| Publisher | Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute (PUBLISHER • CH) |
| DOI | 10.3390/ijerph182413365 |
| PMID | 34948974 |
| OpenAlex | W4200606670 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 1 |
| References cited | 14 |
Wellness Recovery Action Planning (WRAP) is a structured recovery education program used internationally for anyone who wishes to create a positive change in their life. It was developed by Mary Ellen Copeland and Jane Winterling in the late 90s, resulting from a search of programs or initiatives that could support their wellness. Since then, many studies have been conducted into the efficacy of the program for those with a mental health/addiction challenge. However, to date, there has been little to no synthesis of the evidence base for WRAP outside of the Copeland Center's internal reviews. The proposed systematic review and meta-analysis aims to investigate the evidence base for Wellness Recovery Action Planning within a mental health context. To do this, a PRISMA 2020 compliant review is proposed using the PRISMA-P statement as a guide to demonstrate the methodology to be undertaken. It outlines the inclusion/exclusion criteria, search terms, and databases while informing the readership of timescales to complete such actions. Finally, this protocol also addresses issues of bias and quality within included studies. This proposed literature review and meta-analysis will synthesize and examine the evidence base for WRAP using a systematic review methodology. It is hoped that this proposed review will identify gaps in the current literature regarding the program, and provide recommendations that will support the reviewers in their further studies while also strengthening the argument for a whole system evaluation of WRAP within an Irish context
Alternative medicine · Context (archaeology · Critical appraisal · Evidence-based practice · Grey literature · Inclusion (mineral · Medical education · MEDLINE · Mental health · Meta-analysis · Political science · Protocol (science · Psychotherapist · Systematic review · Applied Psychology · Diabetes Management and Education · Health Policy Implementation Science · Medicine · Mental Health and Patient Involvement · Psychology · Social Psychology
| Citations per year | 1 |
|---|---|
| Citation span | 2025 - 2025 (1) |
| Highly cited | No |