Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Application of Habitat Evaluation Procedure with Quantifying the Eco-Corridor in the Process of Environmental Impact Assessment

Bibliographic Data

ID15468383
AuthorsJi‐young Choi (0000-0002-2022-3741, Ewha Womans University), Jiyoung Choi (0000-0002-2702-1245, Ewha Womans University), Sang-Don Lee (0000-0002-3282-873X, Ewha Womans University, corresponding author)
Year2019
Volume16
Issue8
Pages1437-1437
Publication date2019-04-23
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueInternational Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 1661-7827 • E-ISSN: 1660-4601
PublisherMultidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute (PUBLISHER • CH)
DOI10.3390/ijerph16081437
PMID31018499
OpenAlexW2937711067
LanguageEN
Citations received3
References cited10

In contrast to other fields, environmental protection (e.g., habitat protection) often fails to include quantitative evaluation as part of the existing environmental impact assessment (EIA) process, and therefore the EIA is often a poor forecasting tool, which makes selecting a reasonable plan of action difficult. In this study, we used the Habitat Evaluation Procedure (HEP) to quantify the long-term effects of a road construction project on an ecosystem. The water deer ( Hydropotes inermis ) was selected as the species of study since it uses an optimum habitat; water deer habitat data were collected on vegetation cover, stream water density, geographic contour, land use class, and road networks. The Habitat Suitability Index (HSI) and Cumulative Habitat Unit (CHU) values for the water deer were estimated to investigate the major land cover classes, the national river systems, and vegetation cover. Results showed that the environmental impact in the road construction project area would result in a net ecological loss value of 1211 without installation of an eco-corridor, which reduced to 662 with an eco-corridor, providing a 55% increase in the net value after 50 years of the mitigation plan. Comparing the 13 proposed ecological mitigation corridors, the corridor that would result in the highest net increase (with an increase of 69.5), was corridor #4, which was regarded as the most appropriate corridor to properly connect water deer habitat. In sum, the study derived the net increase in quantitative values corresponding with different mitigation methods over time for a road construction project; this procedure can be effectively utilized in the future to select the location of ecological corridors while considering the costs of constructing them

Ecological assessment · Environmental impact assessment · Environmental resource management · Habitat · Impact assessment · Land cover · Land use · Vegetation (pathology · Environmental Science · Land Use and Ecosystem Services · Wildlife Ecology and Conservation · Wildlife-Road Interactions and Conservation · Ecology

  • Urban Ecological Corridor Network Construction

    Open Access•Yuhan Tang, Chi Gao et al.•ISPRS International Journal of…•2020

  • Biodiversity impact assessment of two large dam projects in India under long term multi-scenarios simulation

    L Raghu Ram Tata•Impact Assessment and Project…•2021

  • Analysis of Roadkill on the Korean Expressways from 2004 to 2019

    Open Access•Minkyung Kim, Hyomin Park et al.•International Journal of…•2021

  • Effects of Habitat Fragmentation on Biodiversity

    Lenore Fahrig•Annual Review of Ecology,…•2003

Citations per year0.5
Citation span2020 - 2021 (2)
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOISci-HubOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae