Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Influence and Action Mechanisms of Governmental Relations Embeddedness for Fostering Green Production Demonstration Household

Evidence from Shaanxi, Sichuan, and Anhui Province, China

Bibliographic Data

ID15468469
AuthorsLipeng Li (Ningxia University), Apurbo Sarkar (0000-0001-6520-9217, Northwest A&F University), Xi Zhou (0000-0002-7067-0005, The University of Queensland), Xiuling Ding (Northwest A&F University, corresponding author), Hua Li (0000-0002-1778-8071, Northwest A&F University, corresponding author)
Year2022
Volume19
Issue19
Pages11923-11923
Publication date2022-09-21
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueInternational Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 1661-7827 • E-ISSN: 1660-4601
PublisherMultidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute (PUBLISHER • CH)
DOI10.3390/ijerph191911923
PMID36231224
OpenAlexW4296625135
LanguageEN
References cited132

As an innovative tactic, the core aspects of green products should be comprehensively demonstrated and firmly promoted to enhance their adoption. For doing so, continuous governmental support and interventions through distinct sets of networking and relationships could be crucial for synthesizing and diffusing the extent of green production demonstration households. Interestingly, the structural relationship between these two has not yet been evaluated comprehensively by the existing literature. Therefore, the study empirically analyzes the impact and mechanism of government relationships embedded in fostering green production demonstration households. The study compiles the empirical data from 963 farmers which were collected from the major tea-producing areas of Shaanxi, Sichuan, and Anhui provinces, China. In order to craft the findings, first we constructed the ordered Probit for benchmark regression analysis. Meanwhile, the Ordinary Standard Error Ordered Probit model, Ordered Logit model, and multivariate linear model were constructed for the robustness test. Third, the Extended Ordered Probit model and Bootstrap mediation effect model were used to test the path diagram. Finally, robustness testing and endogeneity processing test were used to explore the reliability of the findings. The results showed that: (i) Government relationship embedding has a positive effect on fostering green production demonstration households. In particular, factors such as relationships with general government staff, professional and technical personnel, and village cadre are most significant. (ii) Seemingly, the heterogeneity analysis shows that the farmers with large operating scales and low family economic status have a relatively stronger impact. (iii) Further mechanism research results show that government relations are embedded through government identification (policy identification, government trust), improving farmers' behavioral ability (production knowledge reserve, self-efficacy), and strengthening farmers' perceived value of green production (self-interest perception, altruistic values). Therefore, the government should strengthen the interactive mechanism embedded with farm households and extend support for green production demonstration zones. The farmers' information-sharing facilities and platforms should be modernized and highlighted according to the local conditions and long-term targeted strategies

Action (physics · Business · China · Economic geography · Economics · Embeddedness · Geography · Political science · Production (economics · Social science · Socioeconomics · Sociology · Environmental Education and Sustainability · Environmental Sustainability in Business · Organic Food and Agriculture

  • Adoption of Multiple Sustainable Agricultural Practices in Rural Ethiopia

    Open Access•Hailemariam Teklewold, Menale Kassie et al.•Journal of Agricultural Economics•2013

  • What will drive the small tea growers towards environment-friendly cultivation? Implications from the tea sector in Assam, India

    Nabajyoti Deka, Kishor Goswami et al.•Climate and Development•2022

  • What factors contribute to conversion to organic farming? Consideration of the Health Belief Model in relation to the uptake of organic farming by Iranian farmers

    Mahdieh Yazdanpanah, Maryam Tajeri Moghadam et al.•Journal of Environmental Planning…•2022

  • Land Tenure and Green Production Behavior

    Open Access•Hui Mao, Yujia Chai et al.•International Journal of…•2021

  • Willingness and Behaviors of Farmers’ Green Disposal of Pesticide Packaging Waste in Henan, China

    Open Access•Mingyue Li, Jingjing Wang et al.•International Journal of…•2020

  • Improvement in irrigation water use efficiency

    Open Access•Nguyen Bich Hong, Mitsuyoshi Yabe•Environment Development and…•2017

  • Understanding the pro-environmental behavior among green poultry farmers

    Open Access•Saeed Gholamrezai, Vahid Aliabadi et al.•Environment Development and…•2021

  • Economic growth of green agriculture and its influencing factors in china

    Open Access•Zhao-Liang Li, Zhaoliang Li et al.•Environment Development and…•2021

  • Impact of green control techniques on family farms' welfare

    Open Access•Yang Gao, Ziheng Niu et al.•Ecological Economics•2019

  • Digital agriculture to design sustainable agricultural systems

    Open Access•Bruno Basso, John M Antle•Nature Sustainability•2020

  • Understanding pollution behavior among farmers

    Open Access•Wolin Zheng, Biliang Luo•Energy Research & Social Science•2022

  • Reciprocity, redistribution and relational values

    Open Access•Kristal Jones, Daniel Tobin•Current Opinion in Environmental…•2018

  • Social Acceptance of Dairy Farming

    Open Access•B K Boogaard, B B Bock et al.•Journal of Agricultural and…•2010

  • Using the theory of planned behavior to understand the intention of small farmers in diversifying their agricultural production

    Open Access•Igor Senger, João Augusto Rossi Borges et al.•Journal of Rural Studies•2016

  • Combinations of bonding, bridging, and linking social capital for farm innovation

    Open Access•Gabriela Cofré-Bravo, Laurens Klerkx et al.•Journal of Rural Studies•2019

  • Modeling cereal farmers’ intended and actual adoption of integrated crop management (ICM) practices

    Open Access•Alireza Bagheri, Asghar Bagheri et al.•Journal of Rural Studies•2019

  • An analysis of farmers’ intention to use green pesticides

    Open Access•Pouria Ataei, Saeed Gholamrezai et al.•Journal of Rural Studies•2020

  • Does experience sharing affect farmers’ pro-environmental behavior? A randomized controlled trial in Vietnam

    Open Access•Ha Thu Vu, Duc Tran et al.•World Development•2020

  • Beyond Agriculture Versus Non-Agriculture

    Open Access•Paul A Dorosh, Paul Dorosh et al.•World Development•2016

  • The influence of behavioural factors and external conditions on Dutch farmers’ decision making in the transition towards circular agriculture

    Open Access•Carolien de Lauwere, Monique Slegers et al.•Land Use Policy•2022

  • Adoption of green fertilizer technology among paddy farmers

    Open Access•Nadia Adnan, Shahrina Md Nordin et al.•Land Use Policy•2017

  • Exploring the drivers of green agricultural development (GAD) in China

    Open Access•Zhe Chen, Apurbo Sarkar et al.•Land Use Policy•2022

  • The effect of farmyard manure on the continued and discontinued use of inorganic fertilizer in Ethiopia

    Open Access•Sied Hassen•Land Use Policy•2018

  • Structural equation modeling for indicators of sustainable agriculture

    Open Access•Apurbo Sarkar, Jony Abdul Azim et al.•Land Use Policy•2021

  • Adoption of interrelated sustainable agricultural practices among smallholder farmers in Ghana

    Open Access•Dennis Sedem Ehiakpor, Gideon Danso-Abbeam et al.•Land Use Policy•2021

  • The changing role of local government in organic agriculture development in Wanzai County, China

    Yuhui Qiao, Friederike Martin et al.•Canadian Journal of Development…•2019

  • Gender differentiated small-scale farm mechanization in Nepal hills

    Open Access•Gokul P Paudel, Hom Gartaula et al.•Technology in Society•2020

  • What’s the market got to do with it? Social-ecological embeddedness and environmental practices in a local food system initiative

    Open Access•Russell C Hedberg, K S Zimmerer•Geoforum•2020

  • Seeking justice in Green Revolutions

    Open Access•Nathan Clay•Geoforum•2018

  • Agricultural Transformation and the Escape from the Middle-Income-Country Trap

    Shinyoung Jeon•Bulletin of Indonesian Economic…•2013

  • A Market Road to Sustainable Agriculture? Ecological Agriculture, Green Food and Organic Agriculture in China

    Open Access•Richard Sanders•Development and Change•2006

  • Complex Shades of Green

    Open Access•Fred Saunders, Fred P Saunders•Sociologia Ruralis•2016

  • Implementing Cross Compliance for Agriculture in the EU

    Open Access•Meri Juntti•Sociologia Ruralis•2012

  • Farmers' Participation in Civic Agriculture

    Open Access•Giuseppina Migliore, Francesco Caracciolo et al.•Culture Agriculture Food and…•2014

Citation velocityhistorical
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae