Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Evaluating the Effect of Chinese Environmental Regulation on Corporate Sustainability Performance

The Mediating Role of Green Technology Innovation

Bibliographic Data

ID15468960
AuthorsMin Wang (0000-0001-8567-8125, Jiangsu University), Youshi He (Jiangsu University, corresponding author), Jianya Zhou (0009-0005-3379-2838, Jiangsu University), Jian-ya Zhou (Jiangsu University), Kai Ren (0000-0002-3802-7124, Jiangsu University)
Year2022
Volume19
Issue11
Pages6882-6882
Publication date2022-06-04
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueInternational Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 1661-7827 • E-ISSN: 1660-4601
PublisherMultidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute (PUBLISHER • CH)
DOI10.3390/ijerph19116882
PMID35682465
OpenAlexW4281765658
LanguageEN
Citations received5
References cited24

The environmental pollution that accompanies economic growth has always been of widespread concern. The chemical industry is a highly energy-consuming industry in China, and the pollution this industry causes to the environment cannot be ignored. The paper is based on the Porter hypothesis and uses data from different regions of China. In this paper, we investigate the mediating role of different types of environmental regulation (divided into command-controlled, market-incentive, and voluntary environmental regulation) in positively affecting sustainability performance through green technology innovation (divided into green product innovation, green process innovation, and end-of-line management innovation). The results show that different versions of the Porter hypothesis can be accepted in Chinese chemical enterprises. This finding demonstrates that environmental regulation positively impacts both green technology innovation and sustainability performance. Green technology innovation plays a mediating role between environmental regulation and sustainability performance, especially in East China. However, the mediating effect of green product innovation is not significant. Further study shows that command-controlled environmental regulation has a more significant positive effect on sustainability performance. This suggests that the market-incentive and voluntary environmental regulation tools do not fully play their functional roles. Thus, the paper demonstrates the developmental shortcomings of environmental regulation, green technology innovation, and sustainability performance. This is more conducive to chemical enterprises improving green technology innovation and achieving long-term development and ecological environment protection

Business · China · Economics · Environmental management system · Environmental pollution · Environmental protection · Environmental regulation · Environmental scanning · Environmental technology · Green development · Green innovation · Incentive · Industrial organization · Natural resource economics · Porter hypothesis · Product (mathematics · Product innovation · Sustainability · Sustainable development · Energy, Environment, Economic Growth · Environmental Sustainability in Business · Sustainable Supply Chain Management · Ecology

  • Beyond borders

    Open Access•Ayesha Khurshid, Adnan Khurshid et al.•Technological Forecasting and…•2024

  • Does the Environmental Regulation Intensity and ESG Performance Have a Substitution Effect on the Impact of Enterprise Green Innovation

    Open Access•Fengyan Wang, Ziyuan Sun•International Journal of…•2022

  • Multiplayer Strategic Evolutionary Game Model Analysis on the Ban of Single-use Plastic Bags Under the Pakistan Environmental Protection Act 2019

    Open Access•Beenish Amir, Saba Fazal Firdousi et al.•SAGE Open•2025

  • The Empirical Analysis of Environmental Regulation’s Spatial Spillover Effects on Green Technology Innovation in China

    Open Access•Xinyu Wang, Yuanze Chai et al.•International Journal of…•2023

  • The Heterogeneous Effects of Formal and Informal Environmental Regulation on Green Technology Innovation—An Empirical Study of 284 Cities in China

    Open Access•Chuantang Ren, Tao Wang et al.•International Journal of…•2023

  • Mainstreaming Green Product Innovation

    Open Access•Rosa Maria Dangelico, Devashish Pujari•Journal of Business Ethics•2010

  • Environmental Regulation and Enterprise Innovation

    Open Access•Shuai Shao, Zhigao Hu et al.•Business Strategy and the…•2020

  • The effects of three types of environmental regulation on eco-efficiency

    Open Access•Shenggang Ren, Xiaolei Li et al.•Journal of Cleaner Production•2018

  • The dynamics of product innovation and firm competences

    Open Access•Edith Danneels, Erwin Danneels•Strategic Management Journal•2002

  • The Varimax Criterion for Analytic Rotation in Factor Analysis

    Open Access•Henry F Kaiser•Psychometrika•1958

  • Firm Resources and Sustained Competitive Advantage

    Open Access•Jay B Barney, Jay Barney•Journal of Management•1991

  • Environmental Regulation and Innovation

    Adam B Jaffe, K Palmer•The Review of Economics and…•1997

  • The Heterogeneous Effects of Different Environmental Policy Instruments on Green Technology Innovation

    Open Access•Ming Yi, Xiaomeng Fang et al.•International Journal of…•2019

  • Toward a New Conception of the Environment-Competitiveness Relationship

    Open Access•Michael E Porter, Claas Van Der Linde•The Journal of Economic…•1995

Unique citing works5
Citations per year1,25
Citation span2022 - 2025 (4)
Citation velocityrecent
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 5

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae