Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Determinant Factors in Personal Decision-Making to Adopt Covid-19 Prevention Measures in Chile

Bibliographic Data

ID15469232
AuthorsKarina Fernanda Gonzalez (Universidad Católica de la Santísima Concepción), María Bull (0000-0002-6651-5512, Universidad Católica de la Santísima Concepción, corresponding author), Sebastián Muñoz-Herrera (0000-0001-7374-4420, Universidad Católica de la Santísima Concepción), Luis F Robledo (0000-0003-0700-5835, Universidad Andres Bello)
Year2021
Volume18
Issue15
Pages8131-8131
Publication date2021-07-31
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueInternational Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 1661-7827 • E-ISSN: 1660-4601
PublisherMultidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute (PUBLISHER • CH)
DOI10.3390/ijerph18158131
PMID34360433
OpenAlexW3190634362
LanguageEN
Citations received1
References cited9

The pandemic has challenged countries to develop stringent measures to reduce infections and keep the population healthy. However, the greatest challenge is understanding the process of adopting self-care measures by individuals in different countries. In this research, we sought to understand the behavior of individuals who take self-protective action. We selected the risk homeostasis approach to identify relevant variables associated with the risk of contagion and the Protective Action Decision Model to understand protective decision-making in the pandemic. Subsequently, we conducted an exploratory survey to identify whether the same factors, as indicated in the literature, impact Chile's adoption of prevention measures. The variables gender, age, and trust in authority behave similarly to those found in the literature. However, socioeconomic level, education, and media do not impact the protection behaviors adopted to avoid contagion. Furthermore, the application of the Protective Action Decision Model is adequate to understand the protective measures in the case of a pandemic. Finally, women have a higher risk perception and adopt more protective measures, and in contrast, young people between 18 and 30 years of age are the least concerned about COVID-19 infection

Action (physics · Computer security · Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19 · Disease · Environmental health · Exploratory research · Pandemic · Perception · Population · Preventive action · Risk perception · Socioeconomic status · Sociology · Computer Science · COVID-19 and Mental Health · Death Anxiety and Social Exclusion · Medicine · Psychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction · Psychology · Social Psychology

  • Differences between self-initiated and exogenous preparedness

    Open Access•Lanrui Cao, Lan‐Rui Cao et al.•International Journal of Disaster…•2023

  • The impacts of vulnerability, perceived risk, and fear on preventive behaviours against Covid-19

    Murat Yıldırım, Ekmel Geçer et al.•Psychology, Health & Medicine•2021

  • The Protective Action Decision Model

    Open Access•Michael K Lindell, Ronald W Perry•Risk Analysis•2011

  • Perception of Hazards

    Open Access•Michael Siegrist, George Cvetkovich•Risk Analysis•2000

  • Risk perceptions of Covid-19 around the world

    Open Access•Sarah Dryhurst, Claudia R Schneider et al.•Journal of Risk Research•2020

  • Factor analysis of the Covid-19 Perceived Risk Scale

    Murat Yıldırım, Abdurrahim Güler•Death Studies•2020

Unique citing works1
Citations per year0,33
Citation span2023 - 2023 (1)
Citation velocityhistorical
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 1

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae