Opinions towards Key Operational Aspects for the Implementation of HIV Self-Testing in Spain

A Comparison between Stakeholders and Potential Users

Bibliographic Data

ID15469649
AuthorsJuan Hoyos (0000-0003-3772-2771, Universidad Complutense de Madrid), Juan Miguel Guerras (0000-0001-6708-3291, Instituto de Salud Carlos III, corresponding author), Tomás Maté (0000-0003-3441-7771, Universidad de Valladolid), Cristina Agustí (0000-0002-5259-2242, Generalitat de Catalunya), Laura Fernàndez-López (0000-0002-6353-3942, Generalitat de Catalunya), Laura De La Fuente (0000-0003-4527-1608, Instituto de Salud Carlos III), Luis De La Fuente (0000-0003-0845-4691, CIBER Epidemiología y Salud Pública (CIBERESP), 28029 Madrid, Spain), María José Belza (0000-0003-4816-7750, Instituto de Salud Carlos III)
Year2021
Volume18
Issue4
Pages1428-1428
Publication date2021-02-03
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueInternational Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 1661-7827 • E-ISSN: 1660-4601
PublisherMultidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute (PUBLISHER • CH)
DOI10.3390/ijerph18041428
PMID33546500
OpenAlexW3128961558
LanguageEN
Citations received3
References cited19

We assessed previous knowledge about the existence of HIV self-testing of stakeholders in Spain, as well as their personal position towards this methodology. We also assessed their views on potential users' (PU) opinions towards several key operational aspects surrounding self-testing, and compared them to those expressed by a sample of PU comprised of men who have sex with men. In 2017, we recruited three types of stakeholders: public health professionals and policy makers (PHPPM) ( n = 33), clinical providers ( n = 290) and community-based/non-governmental organization (CBO/NGO) workers ( n = 55). Data on PU ( n = 3537) were collected in 2016. Previous knowledge about the existence of self-testing was higher in stakeholders than in PU, but being in favor was less frequent. PUs' willingness to pay 25-30 euros for a self-test was higher than that which stakeholders considered. According to clinical providers and PHPPM, pharmacies would be PUs' preferred place to obtain a self-test, which was in line with PUs' actual choice. CBO/NGO workers on the other hand thought it would be CBO/NGOs. PHPPM and clinical providers considered primary care as PUs' preferred setting to confirm a reactive self-test and CBO/NGO chose CBO/NGOs, but PUs preferred an HIV/STI testing service or clinic. Stakeholders' opinions significantly differed from those of PUs. This divergence needs to be brought up to stakeholders as it could vary their position towards self-testing as well as the actions taken in the implementation of a testing option with the potential of increasing testing frequency

Business · Euros · Family medicine · Human immunodeficiency virus (HIV · Medical education · Political science · Public relations · Sample (material · Service (business · Service provider · Test (biology · HIV Research and Treatment · HIV, Drug Use, Sexual Risk · HIV/AIDS Research and Interventions · Medicine · Nursing · Psychology · Marketing · Pharmacy

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access