Adaptation and Validation of the Brazilian Portuguese Version of the Mental Health Knowledge Schedule (Maks-BR) in the Context of Primary Health Care
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 15469869 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Larissa Moraes Moro (0000-0001-7962-4577, Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul), Vinícius Perinetto Pontel (0009-0007-4323-2011, Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul), Clarissa P P De Freitas (0000-0002-2274-8728, Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul), Adriane X Arteche (0000-0002-2586-4900, Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul), Katia Bones Rocha (0000-0001-7603-1709, Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2025 |
| Volume | 22 |
| Issue | 12 |
| Pages | 1809-1809 |
| Publication date | 2025-11-30 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 1661-7827 • E-ISSN: 1660-4601 |
| Publisher | Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute (PUBLISHER • CH) |
| DOI | 10.3390/ijerph22121809 |
| PMID | 41464443 |
| OpenAlex | W4416901999 |
| Language | EN |
| References cited | 15 |
This study aimed to translate the Mental Health Knowledge Schedule (MAKS) to Brazilian Portuguese, adapt it to the Brazilian primary health care context, and evaluate its psychometric properties. The adaptation process involved three stages: translation, back-translation, and peer-group evaluation. To achieve a valid and reliable instrument, the Brazilian Portuguese version of the questionnaire (MAKS-BR) was administered through an anonymous, online self-administered questionnaire to a convenience sample of 289 primary care professionals with a mean age of 39.6 years (SD = 9.6 years), 90% of whom were women. The instrument, in its final 11-item model, presented satisfactory fit and comparative indices with a two-factor model. The first factor aggregates items related to mental health knowledge, while the second included items related to recognition and familiarity with various mental health conditions. The network findings support the discriminant validity of the two dimensions, while also underscoring the integrative nature of mental health literacy, in which knowledge and recognition processes are interconnected yet functionally distinct. Our findings suggest that the MAKS is an adequate instrument for assessing mental health knowledge, considering the linguistic and cultural contexts of Brazil
Adaptation (eye · Brazilian Portuguese · Context (archaeology · Discriminant validity · Health care · Mental health · Portuguese · Sample (material · Schedule · Family Caregiving in Mental Illness · Health Literacy and Information Accessibility · Mental Health Treatment and Access
The Oxford Handbook of Stigma, Discrimination, and Health
Identifying highly influential nodes in the complicated grief network.
Development and Psychometric Properties of the Mental Health Knowledge Schedule
The Lancet Commission on ending stigma and discrimination in mental health
Mental health-related stigma in health care and mental health-care settings
Qgraph
Mental health-related stigma and attitudes toward patient care among providers of mental health services in a rural Chinese county
Knowledge, contact and stigma of mental illness
French Translation and Validation of Three Scales Evaluating Stigma in Mental Health
Mental illness-related stigma and its associated factors among primary health care professionals in rural China
Exploring the interplay of mental health knowledge, stigma, and social distance among clinical nurses
Arabic validation of the “Mental Health Knowledge Schedule” and the “Reported and Intended Behavior Scale”
Professional preference for mental illness
Assessment of Mental Health Stigma Components of Mental Health Knowledge, Attitudes and Behaviors Among Jordanian Healthcare Providers
How to Measure Knowledge About Mental Disorders? Validation of the Italian Version of the Maks
| Citation velocity | historical |
|---|---|
| Highly cited | No |