Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Multidimensional Evaluation of the Quality of Rural Life Using Big Data from the Perspective of Common Prosperity

Bibliographic Data

ID15469873
AuthorsJing Zhang (0000-0002-6431-9286, Rural Development Institute), Bingbing Huang (0000-0002-7036-2635, Zhejiang University), Xinming Chen (0000-0002-7366-6431, Territorial Consolidation Center in Zhejiang Province, Department of Natural Resources of Zhejiang Province, Hangzhou 310007, China), Congmou Zhu (0009-0003-2400-4970, Zhejiang Gongshang University), Muye Gan (Rural Development Institute, corresponding author)
Year2022
Volume19
Issue21
Pages14166-14166
Publication date2022-10-29
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueInternational Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 1661-7827 • E-ISSN: 1660-4601
PublisherMultidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute (PUBLISHER • CH)
DOI10.3390/ijerph192114166
PMID36361053
OpenAlexW4307869417
LanguageEN
Citations received4
References cited46

Evaluating and revealing the spatial differentiations of quality of rural life (QRL) is the basis for formulating rural revitalization planning to promote rural transformation and achieve common prosperity. Taking the Lin'an District of Hangzhou city in China, an economically developed mountainous area, as an example, this study explored the connotation of QRL from the perspective of common prosperity and constructed a QRL evaluation framework involving living, employment, consumption, and leisure aspects. Then, based on multi-sourced data of 270 administrative villages as the assessment unit, we revealed the spatial patterns of QRL and proposed optimization paths to improving QRL. The results showed that (1) differences in the spatial distribution of quality of rural living, employment, consumption, and leisure of Lin'an District were significant, presenting stepped, block clustering, irregularity, and scattered patterns, respectively. (2) The overall QRL was mainly at a low level, clustered spatially, distributed in a strip pattern, and with obvious road directionality. (3) Based on the evaluation results of QRL, we divided the 270 administrative villages into six types of improvement: livability, employment, consumption, leisure, and balanced and lagged development types. This study could provide a scientific cognitive basis for the improvement of QRL and a useful reference for rural revitalization in China

Business · China · Cluster analysis · Connotation · Consumption (sociology · Economic growth · Economics · Geography · Perspective (graphical · Prosperity · Quality (philosophy · Regional science · Social science · Socioeconomics · Sociology · Unit (ring theory · Computer Science · Land Use and Ecosystem Services · Psychology · Rural development and sustainability · Artificial Intelligence

  • A systematic bibliometric review on tourism prosperity

    Open Access•Yohanes Sulistyadi, Asep Syaiful Bahri et al.•Cogent Social Sciences•2024

  • Can green finance promote inclusive development? Empirical evidence from China

    Open Access•Kangyin Dong, Congyu Zhao et al.•Sustainability Science•2024

  • Equality in the water

    Open Access•Congyu Zhao, Lingqiang Kong et al.•Cities•2024

  • Measurement of Common Prosperity of Chinese Rural Households Using Graded Response Models

    Open Access•Mei Zhang, Xinliang Wang•International Journal of…•2023

  • Quality of life in rural areas

    Open Access•René Brauer, Mirek Dymitrow•Bulletin of Geography.…•2014

  • Co-evolution of technology and rural society

    Open Access•Jing Zhou, Li Yu et al.•Journal of Rural Studies•2021

  • Study on spatial tropism distribution of rural settlements in the Loess Hilly and Gully Region based on natural factors and traffic accessibility

    Open Access•Zongfeng Chen, Yansui Liu et al.•Journal of Rural Studies•2019

  • Rural development pressure and “three-stay” response

    Open Access•Libang Ma, Haojian Dou et al.•Journal of Rural Studies•2022

  • County-rural revitalization spatial differences and model optimization in Miyun District of Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei region

    Open Access•Jintao Li, Yansui Liu et al.•Journal of Rural Studies•2019

  • Identity, Inequality, and Happiness

    Open Access•Shiqing Jiang, Ming Lu et al.•World Development•2011

  • Rural Revitalization in China

    Open Access•Yaofu Huang, Eddie C M Hui et al.•Land Use Policy•2020

  • Quantifying spatio-temporal patterns of urban expansion in Beijing during 1985–2013 with rural-urban development transformation

    Open Access•Yuanyuan Yang, Yansui Liu et al.•Land Use Policy•2018

  • Land consolidation and rural revitalization in China

    Open Access•Yang Zhou, Yamei Li et al.•Land Use Policy•2020

  • Village classification in metropolitan suburbs from the perspective of urban-rural integration and improvement strategies

    Open Access•Yasi Tian, Jing Qian et al.•Land Use Policy•2021

  • Urban expansion and the urban–rural income gap

    Open Access•Sujuan Zhong, Mingshu Wang et al.•Cities•2022

  • The spatial analysis of digital economy and urban development

    Open Access•Wenjing Zhu, Jianjun Chen•Cities•2022

  • "How to Address “Population Decline and Land Expansion (PDLE)" of rural residential areas in the process of Urbanization

    Open Access•Yanbo Qu, Lingyun Zhan et al.•Habitat International•2021

  • Multifunctional rural development in China

    Open Access•Hualou Long, Li Ma et al.•Habitat International•2022

  • Quality evaluation and division of regional types of rural human settlements in China

    Open Access•Qiuyun Hu, Cheng Wang et al.•Habitat International•2020

  • Spatial reconstruction of rural settlements based on livability and population flow

    Open Access•Libang Ma, Shichun Liu et al.•Habitat International•2022

  • Evolution of rural settlements in the Tongzhou District of Beijing under the new-type urbanization policies

    Open Access•Huanhuan Li, Wei Song•Habitat International•2020

  • Assessing the suitability of regional human settlements environment from a different preferences perspective

    Open Access•Yi Wang, Cheng Jin et al.•Habitat International•2017

  • Rural multifunction in Shanghai suburbs

    Open Access•Xiaokun Gu, Boming Xie et al.•Habitat International•2019

  • A framework for assessing sustainable agriculture and rural development

    Open Access•Siwei Hu, Yanying Yang et al.•Environmental Impact Assessment…•2022

  • Quality of Life in the European Union

    Open Access•Nicky Rogge, Ilse Van Nijverseel•Social Indicators Research•2018

  • Social capital, outpatient care utilization and choice between different levels of health facilities in rural and urban areas of Bhutan

    Open Access•Chantal Herberholz, Sonam Phuntsho•Social Science & Medicine•2018

  • Perceptions of Society's Necessary Standard of Living

    Open Access•Tamara Gutfleisch, Hans‐jürgen Andreß et al.•Social Indicators Research•2020

Unique citing works4
Citations per year1,33
Citation span2023 - 2024 (2)
Citation velocityrecent
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 4

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae