Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Nudging Strategies for Arable Land Protection Behavior in China

Bibliographic Data

ID15470313
AuthorsYanwei Zhang (0000-0002-7063-2308, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, corresponding author), Xinhai Lu (0000-0002-3368-8636, Central China Normal University, corresponding author), Yucheng Zou (0000-0002-5748-7126, Zhejiang University), Tiangui Lv (0009-0005-1504-7332, Jiangxi University of Finance and Economics)
Year2022
Volume19
Issue19
Pages12609-12609
Publication date2022-10-02
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueInternational Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 1661-7827 • E-ISSN: 1660-4601
PublisherMultidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute (PUBLISHER • CH)
DOI10.3390/ijerph191912609
PMID36231906
OpenAlexW4303696460
LanguageEN
Citations received2
References cited43

Arable land protection is critical to the sustainable development of agriculture in China and acceleration of the realization of the trinity protection goal of the quantity, quality, and ecology of arable land. As a new program of behavioral science to promote social development, nudge has gradually gained the favor of researchers and policy makers due to its unique advantages of small cost and substantial effect. However, current research and practical exploration of arable land protection behavior intervention based on the idea of nudging are still lacking. Implicit nudging strategies directly target the heuristic and analytic systems of arable land protection behavior of each stakeholder and possess more advantages than traditional intervention strategies. Therefore, this article designs six arable land protection behavior nudging strategies from the perspectives of cognition and motivation to realize the theoretical discussion of "generating medium-scale returns with nano-level investment". The nudging strategies of the cognitive perspective include default options, framing effects, and descriptive norms, while those of the motivation perspective aim to stimulate home and country, and heritage and benefit motives to promote arable land protection behavior of various stakeholders. The utility of nudge to arable land protection behavior may be controversial in practice. Therefore, the implementation in China should be based on the division of farmers, the number of options should be appropriate, and the external environment of arable land protection behavior should be fully considered

Agriculture · Arable land · Business · China · Environmental health · Environmental planning · Environmental protection · Environmental resource management · Geography · Agricultural Innovations and Practices · Agriculture, Land Use, Rural Development · Environmental Science · Land Rights and Reforms · Medicine

  • Analysis of Spatio‐Temporal Variation, Driving Factors and Countermeasures of the Cultivated Land Fragmentation

    Open Access•Yujie Zhou, Yiheng Zhang et al.•Land Degradation and Development•2026

  • Has China’s farmland rotation and fallow system contributed to an increase in grain production

    Open Access•Tong Liu, Renfu Yao et al.•Land Use Policy•2026

  • Seeking Better Health Care Outcomes

    J S Blumenthal-Barby, J S Blumenthal‐barby et al.•The American Journal of Bioethics•2012

  • Urban land expansion and regional inequality in transitional China

    Open Access•Y D Wei, Han Li et al.•Landscape and Urban Planning•2017

  • Nudging and Boosting

    Open Access•Ralph Hertwig, Till Grüne-Yanoff•Perspectives on Psychological…•2017

  • Descriptive Social Norms as Underappreciated Sources of Social Control

    Open Access•Robert B Cialdini•Psychometrika•2007

  • Nudging Farmers to Use Fertilizer

    Esther Duflo, Michael Kremer et al.•American Economic Review•2011

  • Frames of Mind in Intertemporal Choice

    Open Access•G Loewenstein, George F Loewenstein•Management Science•1988

  • Dual-Process Theories of Higher Cognition

    Open Access•Jonathan St B T Evans, Keith E Stanovich•Perspectives on Psychological…•2013

  • The Geographies of Policy Translation

    Open Access•Rhys Jones, Jessica Pykett et al.•Environment and Planning C…•2014

  • Nudges in SRI

    Open Access•Jean-François Gajewski, Marco Heimann et al.•Journal of Business Ethics•2022

  • When choice is demotivating

    Sheena S Iyengar, Mark R Lepper•Journal of Personality and Social…•2000

  • Debate

    Open Access•Daniel M Hausman, Brynn F Welch et al.•Journal of Political Philosophy•2009

  • Wall Slogans

    Open Access•Guoyan Wang•Rural History•2018

  • Enlightened System” or “Regulatory Nightmare”

    Open Access•Peter Siskind•Journal of Policy History•2019

  • Land abandonment under rural restructuring in China explained from a cost-benefit perspective

    Open Access•Ying Zhang, Xiubin Li et al.•Journal of Rural Studies•2016

  • The role of private corporations in regional planning and development

    Open Access•Tiffany H Morrison, Clevo Wilson et al.•Journal of Rural Studies•2012

  • Nudging and corporate environmental responsibility

    Open Access•Leonardo Becchetti, Francesco Salustri et al.•Food Policy•2020

  • What Drives China’s New Agricultural Subsidies

    Open Access•Rigoberto A Lopez, Xi He et al.•World Development•2017

  • The evolving concepts of land administration in China

    Open Access•Wei Li, Tingting Feng et al.•Land Use Policy•2009

  • Quantitative evaluation of China’s cultivated land protection policies based on the PMC-Index model

    Open Access•Bing Kuang, Jing Han et al.•Land Use Policy•2020

  • Analysis of influencing factors of cultivated land fragmentation based on hierarchical linear model

    Open Access•Weiyi Xu, Xiaobin Jin et al.•Land Use Policy•2021

  • Farmers’ attitudes towards the introduction of agri-environmental measures in agricultural infrastructure projects in China

    Open Access•Qian Zhang, He Xiao et al.•Land Use Policy•2015

  • Valuing cultivated land protection

    Open Access•Jianjun Jin, Rui He et al.•Land Use Policy•2018

  • Combining behavioral interventions with market forces in the implementation of land use planning in China

    Open Access•Yuzhe Wu, Zezhou Wu et al.•Land Use Policy•2021

  • Evolutionary game and simulation of management strategies of fallow cultivated land

    Open Access•Hualin Xie, Wei Wang et al.•Land Use Policy•2018

  • Power, capital, and the poverty of farmers’ land rights in China

    Open Access•Zhaohui Hong, Yi Sun•Land Use Policy•2020

  • Institutional transition and implementation path for cultivated land protection in highly urbanized regions

    Open Access•Mo Su, Renzhong Guo et al.•Land Use Policy•2019

  • What gave rise to China’s land finance

    Open Access•Nannan Xu•Land Use Policy•2019

  • How reliable are cultivated land assets as social security for Chinese farmers

    Open Access•Yahui Wang, Xiubin Li et al.•Land Use Policy•2020

  • Evolutionary Game Analysis of Fallow Farmland Behaviors of Different Types of Farmers and Local Governments

    Open Access•Hualin Xie, Shengtian Jin•Land Use Policy•2019

  • Does the stability of farmland rental contract & conservation tillage adoption improve family welfare? Empirical insights from Zhangye, China

    Open Access•Ruishi Si, Lu Qian et al.•Land Use Policy•2021

  • The impacts of farmers’ livelihood capitals on planting decisions

    Open Access•Lun Yang, Moucheng Liu et al.•Land Use Policy•2019

  • Cultivated land protection and rational use in China

    Open Access•Yang Zhou, Xunhuan Li et al.•Land Use Policy•2021

  • Towards cultivated land multifunction assessment in China

    Open Access•Guanghui Jiang, Mingzhu Wang et al.•Land Use Policy•2020

  • Influencing factors of farmers' adoption of pro-environmental agricultural technologies in China

    Open Access•Hualin Xie, Yingqian Huang•Land Use Policy•2021

  • Utilization benefit of cultivated land and land institution reforms

    Open Access•Huan Li, Xiaoling Zhang et al.•Habitat International•2018

  • Farmer differentiation, generational differences and farmers’ behaviors to withdraw from rural homesteads

    Open Access•Runqiu Liu, Chao Yu et al.•Habitat International•2020

  • Evaluating framing effects

    Open Access•James N Druckman•Journal of Economic Psychology•2001

  • Beyond the confines of choice architecture

    Open Access•Björn Meder, Magda Osman et al.•Journal of Economic Psychology•2018

  • Influencing behaviour

    Open Access•Paul Dolan, Michael Hallsworth et al.•Journal of Economic Psychology•2012

  • Framing effects in intertemporal choice tasks and financial implications

    Open Access•Wolfgang Breuer, K Can Soypak•Journal of Economic Psychology•2015

  • To nudge or not to nudge

    Thomas Ploug, Søren Holm et al.•Journal of Epidemiology and…•2012

  • Nudging for Social Change

    Open Access•Julia Shu‐huah Wang•The British Journal of Social Work•2023

  • Why a nudge is not enough

    Open Access•Frank Mols, Alexander Haslam et al.•European Journal of Political…•2015

Unique citing works2
Citations per year2
Citation span2026 - 2026 (1)
Citation velocitycurrent
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 2

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae