What Caused the Outbreak of Covid-19 in China
From the Perspective of Crisis Management
Dados Bibliográficos
| ID | 15472696 |
|---|---|
| Autores | Ziheng Shangguan (0000-0002-1371-8367, Hohai University), Mark Wang (0000-0002-1813-3632, The University of Melbourne, autor correspondente), Wen Sun (0000-0003-4316-5350, East China University of Political Science and Law, autor correspondente) |
| Ano | 2020 |
| Volume | 17 |
| Fascículo | 9 |
| Páginas | 3279-3279 |
| Data de publicação | 2020-05-08 |
| Peer Reviewed | Sim |
| Open Access | Sim |
| Tipo | ARTICLE |
| Periódico | International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health (JOURNAL) |
| Identificadores do periódico | ISSN: 1661-7827 • E-ISSN: 1660-4601 |
| Editora | Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute (PUBLISHER • CH) |
| DOI | 10.3390/ijerph17093279 |
| PMID | 32397199 |
| OpenAlex | W3023585857 |
| Idioma | EN |
| Citações recebidas | 22 |
| Referências citadas | 40 |
Since the first known case of a COVID-19 infected patient in Wuhan, China on 8 December 2019, COVID-19 has spread to more than 200 countries, causing a worldwide public health crisis. The existing literature fails to examine what caused this sudden outbreak from a crisis management perspective. This article attempts to fill this research gap through analysis of big data, officially released information and other social media sources to understand the root cause of the crisis as it relates to China's current management system and public health policy. The article draws the following conclusions: firstly, strict government control over information was the main reason for the early silencing of media announcements, which directly caused most people to be unprepared and unaware of COVID-19. Secondly, a choice between addressing a virus with an unknown magnitude and nature, and mitigating known public panic during a politically and culturally sensitive time, lead to falsehood and concealment. Thirdly, the weak autonomous management power of local public health management departments is not conducive for providing a timely response to the crisis. Finally, the privatization of many state-owned hospitals led to the unavailability of public health medical resources to serve affected patients in the Wuhan and Hubei Province. This article suggests that China should adopt a Singaporean-style public health crisis information management system to ensure information disclosure and information symmetry and should use it to monitor public health crises in real time. In addition, the central government should adopt the territorial administration model of a public health crisis and increase investment in public health in China
Business · China · Crisis management · Development economics · Economics · Emergency management · Government (linguistics · Political science · Public health · Public relations · Social media · COVID-19 epidemiological studies · COVID-19 Pandemic Impacts · Disaster Management and Resilience · Law · Medicine · Public Administration
Collaborative Governance Dalam Optimalisasi Pelaksanaan Kebijakan Pembelajaran Daring Di Masa Pandemi Covid
Who's To Blame for the Covid-19 pandemic? Perceptions of responsibility during the crisis using text mining and latent Dirichlet allocation
China's Public Health Policies in Response to Covid-19
A Citywide ‘Virus Testing
The Analytical Framework of Governance in Health Policies in the Face of Health Emergencies
China's community-based crisis management model for Covid-19
The impact of users' trust on intention to use the mobile medical platform
Scenario-based assessment of emergency management of urban infectious disease outbreaks
Measuring up in a pandemic
The pandemic that shocked managers across the world
Embodying Temporality in Response Efficacy
Perceptions of blame on social media during the coronavirus pandemic
An analysis of China’s strategy in combating the coronavirus pandemic with the 3H framework
Actuar en la emergencia
Online Discourse in the Context of Covid-19, the First Health Crisis in China after the Advent of Mobile Social Media
Communicating Covid-19 on Social Media
Policy capacity during Covid‐19 in Asia
Comparative and international higher education in a new key? Thoughts on the post-pandemic prospects of scholarship
A Comparison of Infection Venues of Covid-19 Case Clusters in Northeast China
Evaluating the Effectiveness of the Covid-19 Emergency Outbreak Prevention and Control Based on CIA-ISM
School principals’ crisis management and leadership roles in post-earthquake educational environments
Managing urban citizens' panic levels and preventive behaviours during Covid-19 with pandemic information released by social media
Risk management in a dynamic society
The Epidemiological Characteristics of an Outbreak of 2019 Novel Coronavirus Diseases (Covid-19) — China, 2020
Crisis and Emergency Risk Communication as an Integrative Model
Can China's Covid-19 strategy work elsewhere?
Preliminary estimation of the basic reproduction number of novel coronavirus (2019-nCoV) in China, from 2019 to 2020
A novel coronavirus outbreak of global health concern
Reframing Crisis Management
Nowcasting and forecasting the potential domestic and international spread of the 2019-nCoV outbreak originating in Wuhan, China
A familial cluster of pneumonia associated with the 2019 novel coronavirus indicating person-to-person transmission
The continuing 2019-nCoV epidemic threat of novel coronaviruses to global health — The latest 2019 novel coronavirus outbreak in Wuhan, China
Early dynamics of transmission and control of Covid-19
Early Transmission Dynamics in Wuhan, China, of Novel Coronavirus–Infected Pneumonia
Clinical features of patients infected with 2019 novel coronavirus in Wuhan, China
Prediction of Epidemic Spread of the 2019 Novel Coronavirus Driven by Spring Festival Transportation in China
Crisis Theory and Sars
The Resurrection of Autonomy
The Bureau‐politics of Crisis Management
Globalization and its discontents
Towards a New Typology of Crises
Crises and Crisis Management
| Obras citantes distintas | 22 |
|---|---|
| Citações por ano | 3,67 |
| Intervalo de citações | 2020 - 2025 (6) |
| Velocidade de citação | recent |
| Altamente citado | Não |
| Tipos de citação | Neutras: 22 |