Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

General Practice Care for Patients with Rare Diseases in Belgium. A Cross-Sectional Survey

Bibliographic Data

ID15475497
AuthorsNicole Boffin (0000-0002-5295-0345, Sciensano (Belgium), corresponding author), Elfriede Swinnen (Sciensano (Belgium)), Johan Wens (0000-0002-0229-9064, University of Antwerp), M Galván-Ortiz de Urbina (Sciensano (Belgium)), Johan Van der Heyden (0000-0002-6796-642X, Sciensano (Belgium)), Viviane Van Casteren (Sciensano (Belgium))
Year2018
Volume15
Issue6
Pages1180-1180
Publication date2018-06-05
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueInternational Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 1661-7827 • E-ISSN: 1660-4601
PublisherMultidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute (PUBLISHER • CH)
DOI10.3390/ijerph15061180
PMID29874870
OpenAlexW2805647986
LanguageEN
Citations received2
References cited2

There are almost no studies about rare diseases in general practice. This study examined care characteristics of active rare disease patients in the Belgian Network of Sentinel General Practices (SGP) and the importance of rare diseases in general practice by its caseload, general practitioner (GP)−patient encounter frequency and nationwide prevalence. The SGP reported data about: (i) the number of active rare disease patients in 2015; and (ii) characteristics of one to three most recently seen patients. Rare diseases were matched against Orphanet (www.orpha.net). GP encounter frequency and patients' age were compared to the total general practice population. Details from 121 active patients (median age: 44, interquartile range (IQR) 24−60) showed that for 36.9% the GP had been the first caregiver for the rare disease and for 35.8% the GP established a diagnostic referral. GPs rated their knowledge about their patients' disease as moderate and used Orphanet for 14.9% of patients. Any active rare disease patients (median: 1, IQR 0−2) were reported by 66 of 111 SGP. Compared to the total general practice population, the mean GP encounter frequency was higher (7.3; 95% confidence intervals (CI) 6.1−8.5 versus 5.4; 95% CI 5.4−5.4). The prevalence of rare diseases in the Belgian general practice population was estimated at 12.0 (95% CI 10.3−13.9) per 10,000. This study acknowledges the important role of GPs in rare disease care. Knowledge and use of Orphanet by GPs could be improved

Confidence interval · Cross-sectional study · Disease · Environmental health · Family medicine · General practice · Interquartile range · Pathology · Population · Rare disease · Referral · BRCA gene mutations in cancer · Cystic Fibrosis Research Advances · Demography · Genomics and Rare Diseases · Medicine · Internal Medicine · Pediatrics

  • Identifying health inequities faced by older adults with rare diseases

    Open Access•Jean Pierre Uwitonze, Lize Duminy et al.•Health Policy•2024

  • The utilisation of primary health care system concepts positively impacts the assistance of patients with rare diseases despite limited knowledge and experience by health care professionals

    Open Access•Raquel Lemos Ferreira, Israel Júnior Borges do Nascimento et al.•Journal of Global Health•2023

  • The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) Statement

    Open Access•Erik Von Elm, David G Altman et al.•PLoS Medicine•2007

Citations per year0.67
Citation span2023 - 2024 (2)
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOISci-HubOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae