Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Design and Validity of a Choice-Modeling Questionnaire to Analyze the Feasibility of Implementing Physical Activity on Prescription at Primary Health-Care Settings

Bibliographic Data

ID15475896
AuthorsSergio Calonge‐Pascual (0000-0003-3523-4539, Universidad Politécnica de Madrid), Francisco Fuentes (0000-0002-4584-7366, Universidad Politécnica de Madrid), José A Casajús (0000-0002-7215-6931, Universidad de Zaragoza), Marcela González‐Gross (0000-0001-7757-3235, Instituto de Salud Carlos III, corresponding author)
Year2020
Volume17
Issue18
Pages6627-6627
Publication date2020-09-11
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueInternational Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 1661-7827 • E-ISSN: 1660-4601
PublisherMultidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute (PUBLISHER • CH)
DOI10.3390/ijerph17186627
PMID32932923
OpenAlexW3086781925
LanguageEN
Citations received2
References cited6

Worldwide health policies are trying to implement physical activity on prescription (PAP) at healthcare settings. However, there is not a proper methodology to analyze PHC organizational staff factors. This study aims to validate two questionnaires to assess the self-perception of nurses and general practitioners to implement PAP at primary healthcare (PHC) settings. The designed choice-modeling Google-form questionnaire was sent to 11 expert nurses and 11 expert sports medicine physicians. Experts evaluated each question on a 1-5 points Likert-type scale according to their expertise. Aiken's V coefficient values ≥0.75 were used to validate separately each question using the Visual Basic-6.0 software. A total of 10 sports medicine physicians and 10 nurses with 28.4 ± 5.1 y and 16.3 ± 11.8 y of PAP experience, respectively, validated the questionnaire. One expert in each group was not considered for offering 3 ± SD answers in ≥2 questions respect to the mean of the rest of experts. Final Aiken's V coefficient values were 0.89 (0.77-1.00) for the nurses' questionnaire and 0.84 (0.77-0.95) for the physicians' one. The questionnaires designed to assess the PAP self-perception of PHC nurses and physicians were validated. This methodology could be used to analyze PHC organizational staff factors in order to achieve an efficient PAP implementation in other PHC contexts

Family medicine · Health care · Likert scale · Medical education · Medical prescription · Multiple choice · Perception · Scale (ratio · Behavioral Health and Interventions · Medicine · Nursing · Obesity, Physical Activity, Diet · Physical Activity and Health · Psychology

  • Validation of an Instrument to Measure Natural Science Teachers’ Self-Perception about Implementing STEAM Approach in Pedagogical Practices

    Open Access•Edison Camacho-Tamayo, Andres Bernal-Ballen•Education Sciences•2023

  • Development of an Exploratory Questionnaire Assessing Physical Activity Counselling and Readiness for Green Prescription in Croatian Family Practice

    Open Access•Lorena Bosnar, Pero Hrabač et al.•Critical Public Health•2026

  • Guidelines for developing, translating, and validating a questionnaire in perioperative and pain medicine

    Open Access•Siny Tsang, Colin Royse et al.•Saudi Journal of Anaesthesia•2017

  • Exercise as medicine – evidence for prescribing exercise as therapy in 26 different chronic diseases

    Open Access•Bente Klarlund Pedersen, Bengt Saltin•Scandinavian Journal of Medicine…•2015

  • An Ecological Perspective on Health Promotion Programs

    Open Access•Kenneth R McLeroy, Daniel L Bibeau et al.•Health Education Quarterly•1988

  • Worldwide trends in insufficient physical activity from 2001 to 2016

    Open Access•Regina Guthold, G A Stevens et al.•The Lancet Global Health•2018

  • Physical activity promotion in primary care

    Open Access•Alexis Lion, Anne Vuillemin et al.•Health Promotion International•2019

  • Facilitating adherence to physical activity

    Open Access•Graham Moore, Graham F Moore et al.•BMC Public Health•2011

Unique citing works2
Citations per year0,67
Citation span2023 - 2026 (4)
Citation velocitycurrent
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 2

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae