Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Predictors of Survival in Women with High-Risk Endometrial Cancer and Comparisons of Sandwich versus Concurrent Adjuvant Chemotherapy and Radiotherapy

Bibliographic Data

ID15478917
AuthorsHui-Hua Chen (0000-0002-6299-1888, Far Eastern Memorial Hospital), Wan‐Hua Ting (0000-0001-9450-2834, Far Eastern Memorial Hospital), Hsu‐Dong Sun (Far Eastern Memorial Hospital), Ming‐Chow Wei (Far Eastern Memorial Hospital), Ho‐Hsiung Lin (0000-0001-7370-9545, Far Eastern Memorial Hospital), Sheng‐Mou Hsiao (0000-0002-4381-9564, Far Eastern Memorial Hospital, corresponding author)
Year2020
Volume17
Issue16
Pages5941-5941
Publication date2020-08-16
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueInternational Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 1661-7827 • E-ISSN: 1660-4601
PublisherMultidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute (PUBLISHER • CH)
DOI10.3390/ijerph17165941
PMID32824293
OpenAlexW3049400012
LanguageEN

Background: to elucidate the predictors of progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) in high-risk endometrial cancer patients. Methods: the medical records of all consecutivewomen with high-risk endometrial cancer were reviewed. Results: among 92 high-risk endometrial cancer patients, 30 women experienced recurrence, and 21 women died. The 5-year PFS and OS probabilities were 65.3% and 75.9%, respectively. Multivariable Cox regression revealed that body mass index (hazard ratio (HR) = 1.11), paraaortic lymph node metastasis (HR = 11.11), lymphovascular space invasion (HR = 5.61), and sandwich chemoradiotherapy (HR = 0.15) were independently predictors of PFS. Body mass index (HR = 1.31), paraaortic lymph node metastasis (HR = 32.74), non-endometrioid cell type (HR = 11.31), and sandwich chemoradiotherapy (HR = 0.07) were independently predictors of OS. Among 51 women who underwent sandwich ( n = 35) or concurrent ( n = 16) chemoradiotherapy, the use of sandwich chemoradiotherapy were associated with better PFS (adjusted HR = 0.26, 95% CI = 0.08-0.87, p = 0.03) and OS (adjusted HR = 0.11, 95% CI = 0.02-0.71, p = 0.02) compared with concurrent chemoradiotherapy. Conclusion: compared with concurrent chemoradiotherapy, sandwich chemoradiotherapy was associated with better PFS and OS in high-risk endometrial cancer patients. In addition, high body mass index, paraaortic lymph node metastasis, and non-endometrioid cell type were also predictors of poor OS in high-risk endometrial cancer patients

Cancer · Chemoradiotherapy · Confidence interval · Endometrial cancer · Hazard ratio · Lymphovascular invasion · Metastasis · Paraaortic lymph nodes · Proportional hazards model · Radiation therapy · Cervical Cancer and HPV Research · Endometrial and Cervical Cancer Treatments · Medicine · Ovarian cancer diagnosis and treatment · Internal Medicine · Oncology

Citation velocityhistorical
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae