Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Recruiting and Engaging Women of Reproductive Age with Obesity

Insights from A Mixed-Methods Study within A Trial

Bibliographic Data

ID15480252
AuthorsSarah Louise Killeen (University College Dublin, corresponding author), David Byrne (0000-0003-3885-6915, University College Dublin), David F Byrne (UCD Perinatal Research Centre, School of Medicine, University College Dublin, National Maternity Hospital, D02 YH21 Dublin, Ireland), Aisling A Geraghty (0000-0003-0861-7630, University College Dublin), Cara A Yelverton (0000-0002-6979-756X, University College Dublin), Douwe van Sinderen (0000-0003-1823-7957, National University of Ireland), Paul D Cotter (0000-0002-5465-9068, Teagasc - The Irish Agriculture and Food Development Authority), Eileen F Murphy (Precision Biotics Ltd. (Novozymes Cork), Cork Airport Business Park, Kinsale Road, T12 D292 Cork, Ireland), Sharleen O’Reilly (0000-0003-3547-6634, University College Dublin), Fionnuala M McAuliffe (0000-0002-3477-6494, University College Dublin)
Year2022
Volume19
Issue21
Pages13832-13832
Publication date2022-10-24
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueInternational Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 1661-7827 • E-ISSN: 1660-4601
PublisherMultidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute (PUBLISHER • CH)
DOI10.3390/ijerph192113832
PMID36360712
OpenAlexW4307167598
LanguageEN
References cited67

Engaging women with obesity in health-related studies during preconception is challenging. Limited data exists relating to their participation. The aim of this study is to explore the experiences and opinions of women participating in a weight-related, preconception trial. This is an explanatory sequential (quan-QUAL) mixed-methods Study Within A Trial, embedded in the GetGutsy randomized controlled trial (ISRCTN11295995). Screened participants completed an online survey of eight questions (single or multiple choice and Likert scale) on recruitment, motivations and opinions on study activities. Participants with abdominal obesity (waist circumference ≥ 80 cm) were invited to a subsequent semi-structured, online focus group (n = 2, 9 participants) that was transcribed and analyzed using inductive thematic analysis, with a pragmatic epistemological approach. The survey (n = 102) showed the main research participation motivations were supporting health research (n = 38, 37.3%) and wanting health screening (n = 30, 29.4%). Most participants were recruited via email (n = 35, 34.7%) or social media (n = 15, 14.7%). In the FGs, participants valued flexibility, convenience and. research methods that aligned with their lifestyles. Participants had an expanded view of health that considered emotional well-being and balance alongside more traditional medical assessments. Clinical trialists should consider well-being, addressing the interconnectedness of health and incorporate a variety of research activities to engage women of reproductive age with obesity

Developmental psychology · Environmental health · Family medicine · Flexibility (engineering · Focus group · Likert scale · Obesity · Population · Qualitative research · Randomized controlled trial · Reproductive health · Social media · Thematic analysis · Waist · Bariatric Surgery and Outcomes · Gestational Diabetes Research and Management · Medicine · Obesity and Health Practices · Psychology · Gerontology

  • Pregnancy

    Open Access•Suzanne Phelan•American Journal of Obstetrics…•2010

  • Unintended pregnancy and abortion by income, region, and the legal status of abortion

    Open Access•Jonathan Bearak, Anna Popinchalk et al.•The Lancet Global Health•2020

  • Self‐stigma and the “why try” effect

    Open Access•Patrick W Corrigan, Jonathon E Larson et al.•World Psychiatry•2009

  • Obesity

    Open Access•George A Bray, K K Kim et al.•Obesity Reviews•2017

  • Consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research (Coreq)

    A Jaure, A Tong et al.•International Journal for Quality…•2007

  • A “messy ball of wool”

    Open Access•Kathryn Ogden, J Barr et al.•BMC Psychology•2020

  • Recruiting and retaining postpartum women from areas of social disadvantage in a weight‐loss trial – an assessment of strategies employed in the WeighWell feasibility study

    Open Access•Maureen Macleod, Angela M Craigie et al.•Maternal and Child Nutrition•2012

  • Get alongside us’, women's experiences of being overweight and pregnant in Sydney, Australia

    Open Access•Annie Mills, Virginia Schmied et al.•Maternal and Child Nutrition•2011

  • Women in the Workplace

    Open Access•Seonad K Madden, Helen Skouteris et al.•International Journal of…•2020

  • A study on body-weight perception, future intention and weight-management behaviour among normal-weight, overweight and obese women in India

    Open Access•Praween Agrawal, Kamla Gupta et al.•Public Health Nutrition•2014

  • Internalized weight stigma moderates eating behavior outcomes in women with high BMI participating in a healthy living program

    Open Access•Janell L Mensinger, Rachel M Calogero et al.•Appetite•2016

  • Using thematic analysis in psychology

    Open Access•Braun, Virginia Braun et al.•Qualitative Research in Psychology•2006

  • Obesity Stigma

    Rebecca M Puhl, Chelsea A Heuer•American Journal of Public Health•2010

  • Three Approaches to Qualitative Content Analysis

    Open Access•Hsiu-Fang Hsieh, Sarah E Shannon•Qualitative Health Research•2005

  • A Pragmatist Approach to the Problem of Knowledge in Health Psychology

    Open Access•F Cornish, A Gillespie•Journal of Health Psychology•2009

  • Using Mixed-Methods Sequential Explanatory Design

    Open Access•Nataliya V Ivankova, John W Creswell et al.•CAM•2006

Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae