Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Assessment of a Screening Questionnaire to Identify Exposure to Lead in Pregnant Women

Bibliographic Data

ID15480555
AuthorsEléna Coiplet (Hôpital de la Conception, corresponding author), Marine Freuchet (Hôpital de la Conception), Claire Sunyach (0000-0003-1462-5610, Hôpital de la Conception), Jason Mancini (0000-0001-9500-8598, Inserm), Jeanne Perrin (Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique), Blandine Courbière (0000-0002-1847-4509, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique), Hélène Heckenroth (Hôpital de la Conception), Christel Pissier (Pharmacokinetics and Toxicology Laboratory (Laboratoire de Pharmacocinétique et Toxicologie), AP-HM, 13005 Marseille, France), Naima Hamdaoui (Department of Gynecology-Obstetric and Reproductive Medicine, Women-Parents-Children Centre (Pôle Femmes-Parents-Enfants/Hôpital La Conception), 147 Boulevard Baille, 13005 Marseille, France), Florence Bretelle (0000-0002-0909-3202, Méditerranée Infection Foundation, corresponding author)
Year2020
Volume17
Issue24
Pages9220-9220
Publication date2020-12-10
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueInternational Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 1661-7827 • E-ISSN: 1660-4601
PublisherMultidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute (PUBLISHER • CH)
DOI10.3390/ijerph17249220
PMID33321747
OpenAlexW3112352898
LanguageEN
References cited19

Lead readily crosses the placenta and displays adverse effects on birth outcomes and neurodevelopment. Systematic identification of the risk of exposure during pregnancy is essential but rarely performed, probably due to hospital staff's workload and their lack of awareness. We aimed to evaluate the relevance of a questionnaire to screen pregnant women for lead exposure. A cross-sectional, multicentre study was carried out on a population of 792 pregnant women from February 2018 to May 2020. A total of 596 women had a blood lead test: 68.5% had blood lead levels below 10 μg/L. The estimated prevalence above 25 μg/L was 4% (95% confidence interval (CI) [2.6-5.9]) and 1.3% had levels above 50 μg/L (95% CI [0.6-2.6]). Multivariate analysis showed that three risk factors significantly increased the probability of blood lead levels above 25 μg/L: the use of traditional cosmetics (adjusted odds ratio [aOR]: 3.90; 95% CI [1.65-9.21]; p = 0.002), degraded old housing (aOR: 2.67; 95% CI [1.19-6.038]; p = 0.018), and (marginally) eating bread more than twice a day (aOR: 2.40; 95% CI [0.96-6.11]; p = 0.060). Our study reveals that a three-question tool can be used to quickly screen for the risk of lead exposure in our population and to trigger lead blood tests and special vigilance during pregnancy follow-up

Blood lead level · Blood test · Confidence interval · Environmental health · Gynecology · Lead (geology · Lead exposure · Lead poisoning · Obstetrics · Odds ratio · Population · Pregnancy · Environmental Justice and Health Disparities · Heavy Metal Exposure and Toxicity · Medicine · Mercury impact and mitigation studies · Internal Medicine

Citation velocityhistorical
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae