Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Relationship between Doping Prevalence and Socioeconomic Parameters

An Analysis by Sport Categories and World Areas

Bibliographic Data

ID15488258
AuthorsJosé Luís Terreros (CELAD, Spanish Commission of Anti-Doping Fight, 29016 Madrid, Spain), Pedro Manonelles (0000-0002-8728-5568, Universidad Católica de Murcia), Daniel López-Plaza (0000-0003-1832-273X, Universidad Católica de Murcia, corresponding author)
Year2022
Volume19
Issue15
Pages9329-9329
Publication date2022-07-30
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueInternational Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 1661-7827 • E-ISSN: 1660-4601
PublisherMultidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute (PUBLISHER • CH)
DOI10.3390/ijerph19159329
PMID35954686
OpenAlexW4289134221
LanguageEN
Citations received1
References cited21

Socioeconomic differences between countries, including corruption and doping scandals, have increased in the last few decades. The aims of the current investigation were to examine doping prevalence according to world areas and sport groups and its association with socioeconomic factors worldwide. The Anti-Doping Rule Violations (ADRVs) of 160 countries competing at 2016 Olympics were analyzed between 2013 and 2018. In addition, the relationship between doping prevalence and socioeconomic characteristics, including Human Development Index (HDI), Per Capita Income (PCI) and Corruption Index (CI), was investigated. Africa, Asia, and America were revealed to have a significantly lower doping prevalence than Europe and Oceania when observing the sum and the mean ADRV/10,000 inhabitants (p < 0.01). Strong to moderate correlations were identified between Corruption Index and ADRVs and HDI and ADRVs (p < 0.01). However, the number of Olympic athletes was positively associated with the ADRVs and the HDI (r = 0.663 and 0.424, respectively). In the comparison by sport groups, the Independent Recognized Sports (AIMS) showed significantly higher Adverse Analytical Findings (AAF) and ADRVs (p < 0.01) than Olympic and Recognized International Sports (ARISF). In conclusion, the results of the current study reveal doping prevalence differences between world areas and sport categories, identifying associations with socioeconomic characteristics of each country

Economic growth · Economics · Environmental health · Geography · Human development (humanity · Human Development Index · Index (typography · Per capita income · Population · Socioeconomic status · Socioeconomics · Sociology · Demography · Doping in Sports · Hormonal and reproductive studies · Medicine · Sports Analytics and Performance

  • The influence of self-esteem and self-efficacy on doping susceptibility and intention in amateur athletes and exercisers

    Open Access•Diana Korinna Zazueta-Beltrán, Roxana Abril Morales-Beltrán et al.•Frontiers in Sports and Active…•2026

  • Doing What Is Right and Doing It Right”

    Open Access•Toby Woolway, Lambros Lazuras et al.•International Journal of Drug…•2020

  • Drug testing in sport

    Open Access•Matthew Dunn, Johanna O Thomas et al.•International Journal of Drug…•2010

  • Unbundling Corruption

    Yuen Yuen Ang•Global Perspectives•2020

  • Attitudes Toward Doping and Recreational Drug Use among French Elite Student-Athletes

    Patrick Peretti-Watel, Patrick Peretti‐watel et al.•Sociology of Sport Journal•2004

  • Fair Play

    Robert L Simon, Carlos Ronderos Torres et al.•Fair Play•2018

  • A theory of human motivation

    Abraham H Maslow•Psychological Review•1943

Citations per year1
Citation span2026 - 2026 (1)
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae