Introducing the Hungarian Version of the SCREENIVF Tool into the Clinical Routine Screening of Emotional Maladjustment
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 15488271 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Viktória Prémusz (0000-0002-4059-104X, University of Pecs, corresponding author), Pongrác Ács (0000-0002-4999-7345, University of Pecs), Jozsef Bódis (0000-0003-0597-9097, University of Pecs), Ákos Várnagy (0000-0003-0756-5584, University of Pecs), Ágnes Lászik (University of Pecs), Alexandra Makai (0000-0002-1907-120X, University of Pecs) |
| Year | 2022 |
| Volume | 19 |
| Issue | 16 |
| Pages | 10147-10147 |
| Publication date | 2022-08-16 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 1661-7827 • E-ISSN: 1660-4601 |
| Publisher | Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute (PUBLISHER • CH) |
| DOI | 10.3390/ijerph191610147 |
| PMID | 36011781 |
| OpenAlex | W4292253886 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 2 |
| References cited | 61 |
Examining possible psychosocial maladjustments should be an integral part of fertility care. For the early detection of vulnerability, the present study aimed to adapt and test the reliability and validity of the Hungarian version of SCREENIVF against the Fertility Quality of Life Questionnaire (FertiQoL) in a cross-sectional on subfertile women (n = 60, age 34.6 ± 5.2 years, BMI 24.2 ± 4.9 kg/m2) at a university linked fertility clinic in South-Hungary. A confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) was conducted to investigate the construct validity. For the reliability testing, Cronbach alpha values were calculated. Spearman’s rank correlation tested the criterion validity. Discriminant validity was applied using Mann−Whitney U-test and Kruskal−Wallis test. The Edinburgh Framework and COSMIN checklist were applicable for the analysis using SPSS 27.0; significance was set at p < 0.05. The confirmatory factor analysis indicated a good fit; all dimensions were reliable (α ≥ 0.70). Cronbach’s alpha was excellent (0.825−0.904). Strong correlations were found between the total scale (FertiQoL) and anxiety (R = −0.507, p < 0.001), depression (R = 0.554, p < 0.001), and helplessness cognitions (R = −0.747, p < 0.001) and moderate or no correlation with acceptance cognitions (R = 0.317, p = 0.015) and social support (R = 0.230, p = 0.082). The Hungarian version of SCREENIVF proved a valid and reliable tool to measure psychological maladjustment before ART. A longitudinal, randomized, controlled trial involving the partners could further strengthen the results, which is among our long-term plans
Checklist · Confirmatory factor analysis · Construct validity · Criterion validity · Cronbach's alpha · Discriminant validity · Psychiatry · Psychometrics · Psychosocial · Statistics · Structural equation modeling · Assisted Reproductive Technology and Twin Pregnancy · Clinical Psychology · Family Dynamics and Relationships · Psychology · Reproductive Health and Technologies
Applied Structural Equation Modeling Using Amos
National, Regional, and Global Trends in Infertility Prevalence Since 1990
International estimates of infertility prevalence and treatment-seeking
Fit indices in covariance structure modeling
Guidelines for the Process of Cross-Cultural Adaptation of Self-Report Measures
Making sense of Cronbach's alpha
Psychometric properties of the Beck Depression Inventory
Mediating Effects of Emotional Self-Disclosure on the Relationship between Depression and Quality of Life for Women Undergoing In-Vitro Fertilization
Childlessness
Assessment of Quality of Life in Infertility Treated Women in Poland
Perceptions of Fertility Physicians Treating Women Undergoing IVF Using an Egg Donation
Multicausal analysis on psychosocial and lifestyle factors among patients undergoing assisted reproductive therapy – with special regard to self-reported and objective measures of pre-treatment habitual physical activity
The Cosmin checklist for assessing the methodological quality of studies on measurement properties of health status measurement instruments
| Unique citing works | 2 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 1 |
| Citation span | 2024 - 2026 (3) |
| Citation velocity | current |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 2 |