Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Ecological Responses of Maize Rhizosphere to Antibiotics Entering the Agricultural System in an Area with High Arsenicals Geological Background

Bibliographic Data

ID15489237
AuthorsMengli Li (0000-0001-5881-2763, Guilin University of Technology), Yongshan Chen (0000-0002-8921-4771, Quanzhou Normal University, corresponding author), Ying Feng (0009-0006-7838-3103, Quanzhou Normal University), Xiaofeng Li (0000-0002-0490-1717, Quanzhou Normal University), Lili Ye (0000-0002-4057-8646, Guilin University of Technology), Jinping Jiang (Guilin University of Technology, corresponding author)
Year2022
Volume19
Issue20
Pages13559-13559
Publication date2022-10-19
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueInternational Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 1661-7827 • E-ISSN: 1660-4601
PublisherMultidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute (PUBLISHER • CH)
DOI10.3390/ijerph192013559
PMID36294139
OpenAlexW4306836064
LanguageEN
References cited61

Metal(loid)s can promote the spread and enrichment of antibiotic resistance in the environmental ecosystem through a co-selection effect. Little is known about the ecological effects of entering antibiotics into the environment with long-term metal(loid)s' resistance profiles. Here, cow manure containing oxytetracycline (OTC) or sulfadiazine (SA) at four concentrations (0 (as control), 1, 10, and 100 mg/kg) was loaded to a maize cropping system in an area with high a arsenicals geological background. Results showed that exogenous antibiotics entering significantly changed the nutrient conditions, such as the concentration of nitrate nitrogen, ammonium nitrogen, and available phosphorus in the maize rhizosphere soil, while total arsenic and metals did not display any differences in antibiotic treatments compared with control. Antibiotics exposure significantly influenced nitrate and nitrite reductase activities to reflect the inhibition of denitrification rates but did not affect the soil urease and acid phosphatase activities. OTC treatment also did not change soil dehydrogenase activities, while SA treatment posed promotion effects, showing a tendency to increase with exposure concentration. Both the tested antibiotics (OTC and SA) decreased the concentration of arsenite and arsenate in rhizosphere soil, but the inhibition effects of the former were higher than that of the latter. Moreover, antibiotic treatment impacted arsenite and arsenate levels in maize root tissue, with positive effects on arsenite and negative effects on arsenate. As a result, both OTC and SA treatments significantly increased bioconcentration factors and showed a tendency to first increase and then decrease with increasing concentration. In addition, the treatments decreased translocation capacity of arsenic from roots to shoots and showed a tendency to increase translocation factors with increasing concentration. Microbial communities with arsenic-resistance profiles may also be resistant to antibiotics entering

Agronomy · Animal science · Antibiotics · Arsenate · Arsenic · Arsenite · Bacteria · Biology · Nitrate · Nitrate reductase · Nitrite reductase · Oxytetracycline · Phosphorus · Rhizosphere · Sodium arsenate · Urease · Arsenic contamination and mitigation · Chemistry · Pesticide and Herbicide Environmental Studies · Pharmaceutical and Antibiotic Environmental Impacts · Biochemistry · Environmental Chemistry

Citation velocityhistorical
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae