Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Food Industry Donations to Academic Programs

A Cross-Sectional Examination of the Extent of Publicly Available Data

Bibliographic Data

ID15499580
AuthorsMarie A Bragg (0000-0002-6858-7173, New York University, corresponding author), Brian Elbel (0000-0003-1615-9430, Wagner College), Marion Nestle (New York University)
Year2020
Volume17
Issue5
Pages1624-1624
Publication date2020-03-03
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueInternational Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 1661-7827 • E-ISSN: 1660-4601
PublisherMultidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute (PUBLISHER • CH)
DOI10.3390/ijerph17051624
PMID32138233
OpenAlexW3009724354
LanguageEN
Citations received2
References cited25

No studies have documented the prevalence of the food industry's funding of academic programs, which is problematic because such funding can create conflicts of interest in research and clinical practice. We aimed to quantify the publicly available information on the food industry's donations to academic programs by documenting the amount of donations given over time, categorizing the types of academic programs that receive food industry donations, cataloguing the source of the donation information, and identifying any stated reasons for donations. Researchers cataloged online data from publicly available sources (e.g., official press releases, news articles, tax documents) on the food industry's donations to academic programs from 2000 to 2016. Companies included 26 food and beverage corporations from the 2016 Fortune 500 list in the United States. Researchers recorded the: (1) monetary value of the donations; (2) years the donations were distributed; (3) the name and type of recipient; (4) source of donation information; and (5) reasons for donations. Adjusting for inflation, we identified $366 million in food industry donations (N = 3274) to academic programs. Universities received 45.2% ( n = 1480) of donations but accounted for 67.9% of total dollars given in the sample. Community colleges, schools (i.e., preschool, elementary, middle, and high schools), and academic nonprofits, institutes, foundations, and research hospitals collectively received 54.8% of the donations, but made up less than one-third of the monetary value of donations. Half of the donations (49.0%) did not include a stated reason for the donation. In our sample, donations grew from $3 million in 2000 to $24 million in 2016. Food companies in our sample donated millions of dollars to universities and other academic programs but disclosed little information on the purpose of the donations. Achieving transparency in donation practices may only be possible if federal policies begin to require disclosures or if companies voluntarily disclose information

Business · Donation · Economic growth · Economics · Food industry · Political science · Sample (material · Value (mathematics · Consumer Attitudes and Food Labeling · Global Public Health Policies and Epidemiology · Law · Pharmaceutical industry and healthcare · Marketing

  • A Qualitative Analysis of Black and White Adolescents’ Perceptions of and Responses to Racially Targeted Food and Drink Commercials on Television

    Open Access•Alysa N Miller, Omni Cassidy et al.•International Journal of…•2021

  • Food industry donations to patient advocacy organisations focussed on non-communicable diseases

    Open Access•Inés M Del Giudice, Krystle A Tsai et al.•Public Health Nutrition•2023

  • Sugar Industry and Coronary Heart Disease Research

    Cristin Kearns, Cristin E Kearns et al.•JAMA Internal Medicine•2016

  • The Perils of Ignoring History

    Open Access•Kelly D Brownell, Kenneth E Warner•Milbank Quarterly•2009

  • The World’s Technological Capacity to Store, Communicate, and Compute Information

    Open Access•M Hilbert, Priscila López•Science•2011

  • Source of bias in sugar-sweetened beverage research

    Open Access•Ethan A Litman, Steven L Gortmaker et al.•Public Health Nutrition•2018

  • Evidence of a Dose—Response Relationship Between “truth” Antismoking Ads and Youth Smoking Prevalence

    Matthew C Farrelly, Kevin Davis et al.•American Journal of Public Health•2005

  • Same Strategy Different Industry

    Donna Shelley, Gbenga Ogedegbe et al.•American Journal of Public Health•2014

Unique citing works2
Citations per year0,4
Citation span2021 - 2023 (3)
Citation velocityhistorical
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 2

Tools

Open DOISci-HubOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae