Do Feelings of Defeat and Entrapment Change over Time? An Investigation of the Integrated Motivational—Volitional Model of Suicidal Behaviour Using Ecological Momentary Assessments

Datos Bibliográficos

ID15500697
AutoresJana-Sophie Stenzel (Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf), Inken Höller (0000-0001-6572-1421, University of Duisburg-Essen), Dajana Rath (University of Duisburg-Essen), Nina Hallensleben (0000-0002-4770-6241, Leipzig University), Lena Spangenberg (0000-0001-8248-6734, Leipzig University), Heide Glaesmer (0000-0002-3752-7653, Leipzig University), Thomas Forkmann (0000-0001-9942-2016, University of Duisburg-Essen, autor de correspondencia)
Año2020
Volumen17
Número13
Páginas4685-4685
Fecha de publicación2020-06-29
Peer ReviewedSí
Open AccessSí
TipoARTICLE
RevistaInternational Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health (JOURNAL)
Identificadores de la revistaISSN: 1661-7827 • E-ISSN: 1660-4601
EditorialMultidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute (PUBLISHER • CH)
DOI10.3390/ijerph17134685
PMID32610667
OpenAlexW3038115733
IdiomaEN
Citas recibidas6
Referencias citadas61

(1) Background. Defeat and entrapment have been highlighted as major risk factors of suicidal ideation and behavior. Nevertheless, little is known about their short-term variability and their longitudinal association in real-time. Therefore, this study aims to investigate whether defeat and entrapment change over time and whether defeat predicts entrapment as stated by the integrated motivational-volitional model of suicidal behavior. (2) Methods. Healthy participants ( n = 61) underwent a 7-day smartphone-based ecological momentary assessment (EMA) on suicidal ideation/behavior and relevant risk factors, including defeat and entrapment and a comprehensive baseline (T0) and post (T2) assessment. (3) Results. Mean squared successive differences (MSSD) and intraclass correlations (ICC) support the temporal instability as well as within-person variability of defeat and entrapment. Multilevel analyses revealed that during EMA, defeat was positively associated with entrapment at the same measurement. However, defeat could not predict entrapment to the next measurement (approximately two hours later). (4) Conclusion. This study provides evidence on the short-term variability of defeat and entrapment highlighting that repeated measurement of defeat and entrapment-preferably in real time-is necessary in order to adequately capture the actual empirical relations of these variables and not to overlook significant within-person variability. Further research-especially within clinical samples-seems warranted

Entrapment · Poison control · Suicidal ideation · Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes · Clinical Psychology · Human Factors and Ergonomics · Medicine · Mental Health Research Topics · Psychology · Suicide and Self-Harm Studies