Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Multi-Phase Environmental Impact Assessment of Marine Ecological Restoration Project Based on DPSIR-Cloud Model

Bibliographic Data

ID15501326
AuthorsJunwu Wang (0000-0002-9256-8175, Wuhan University of Technology), Yipeng Liu (0000-0002-4918-925X, Wuhan University of Technology), Mingyang Liu (0000-0001-6755-7346, China State Construction Engineering (China), corresponding author), Suikuan Wang (China State Construction Engineering (China)), Jiaji Zhang (0000-0002-4939-8676, Wuhan University of Technology), Han Wu (0000-0002-0234-3301, Nanchang University)
Year2022
Volume19
Issue20
Pages13295-13295
Publication date2022-10-15
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueInternational Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 1661-7827 • E-ISSN: 1660-4601
PublisherMultidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute (PUBLISHER • CH)
DOI10.3390/ijerph192013295
PMID36293876
OpenAlexW4306382022
LanguageEN
Citations received1
References cited58

In order to achieve a comprehensive evaluation of the environmental impact of ecological restoration projects (ERP) under the current destruction and restoration of coastal ecological areas, this paper takes into account the impact of positive and negative indicators on the environment; analyzes the positive and negative benefits of ERP; and establishes a comprehensive environmental impact index system for marine ERP from ecological, economic, and social perspectives through the DPSIR model. On this basis, the cloud model and Monte Carlo simulation are used to obtain the comprehensive assessment grade of the construction period, short-term operation, and long-term operation in the project life cycle. The results show that the benefits of ERP, considering the impact of negative factors, are significantly reduced, and the benefits of ERP will increase remarkably in the long-term operation period. In engineering practice, the environmental pressure factor caused by excessive human activities during construction and operation periods is a key negative factor affecting the overall benefits of ERP. For project decision makers and other stakeholders, the comprehensive assessment grade considering negative impacts is more practical. At the same time, decision makers should take active response measures in the framework of long-term sustainable development, set a tolerance threshold for negative pressure indicators, and strengthen the management of ERP

Business · Cloud computing · DPSIR · Environmental impact assessment · Environmental planning · Environmental resource management · Impact assessment · Political science · Process management · Risk analysis (engineering · Sustainable development · Coastal and Marine Management · Computer Science · Environmental Science · Land Use and Ecosystem Services · Ecology

  • Evaluation of Enterprise Green Mine Construction Based on DPSIR Model

    Open Access•Wei Yang, Mengge Xue et al.•International Journal of…•2023

  • Uncertainty Analysis for Multi-Region Input–output Models – A Case Study of the Uk's Carbon Footprint

    Manfred Lenzen, Richard Wood et al.•Economic Systems Research•2010

  • A Global Map of Human Impact on Marine Ecosystems

    Open Access•Benjamin S Halpern, Shaun Walbridge et al.•Science•2008

  • International principles and standards for the practice of ecological restoration. Second edition

    Open Access•George D Gann, Tein McDonald et al.•Restoration Ecology•2019

  • Evaluating urban ecosystem resilience using the DPSIR framework and the ENA model

    Open Access•Ruidong Zhao, Chuanglin Fang et al.•Sustainable Cities and Society•2021

  • Evolutionary Process of Promoting Construction Safety Education to Avoid Construction Safety Accidents in China

    Open Access•Feng Guo, Junwu Wang et al.•International Journal of…•2021

  • Dissipation Theory-Based Ecological Protection and Restoration Scheme Construction for Reclamation Projects and Adjacent Marine Ecosystems

    Open Access•Faming Huang, Yanhong Lin et al.•International Journal of…•2019

  • Sustainability assessment of coastal ecosystems

    Open Access•Do Thi Thu Huong, Nguyen Thi Thu Ha et al.•Environment Development and…•2022

  • How the DPSIR framework can be used for structuring problems and facilitating empirical research in coastal systems

    Open Access•Rebecca L Lewison, Murray A Rudd et al.•Environmental Science & Policy•2015

  • The challenges of risk society for impact assessment

    Sanne Vammen Larsen•Journal of Risk Research•2016

  • Trend assessment of the watershed health based on DPSIR framework

    Open Access•Jamal Mosaffaie, Amin Salehpour Jam et al.•Land Use Policy•2021

  • Scenario analysis in environmental impact assessment

    Open Access•Peter N Duinker, Lorne A Greig•Environmental Impact Assessment…•2007

  • The role of time and social churn in impact assessment

    Open Access•Kim A Johnston, Anne B Lane•Environmental Impact Assessment…•2018

  • The ecosystem approach in ecological impact assessment

    Open Access•Joanna Wawrzyczek, Richard Lindsay et al.•Environmental Impact Assessment…•2018

  • Normal cloud model theory-based comprehensive fuzzy assessment of wooden pagoda safety

    Open Access•Ming Guo, Jiawei Zhao et al.•Journal of Cultural Heritage•2022

  • A Social-Ecological System Approach to Analyze Stakeholders' Interactions within a Large-Scale Rangeland Restoration Program

    Open Access•Thorunn Petursdottir, Þórunn Pétursdóttir et al.•Conservation Ecology•2013

Unique citing works1
Citations per year0,33
Citation span2023 - 2023 (1)
Citation velocityhistorical
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 1

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae