Urgent Admission and Inequities in Acute Hospital Stay in Canada
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 15501547 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Kisalaya Basu (0009-0005-1275-5341, Health Canada, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2026 |
| Volume | 23 |
| Issue | 4 |
| Pages | 432-432 |
| Publication date | 2026-03-30 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 1661-7827 • E-ISSN: 1660-4601 |
| Publisher | Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute (PUBLISHER • CH) |
| DOI | 10.3390/ijerph23040432 |
| OpenAlex | W7143440358 |
| Language | EN |
| References cited | 2 |
Background: The Canada Health Act (CHA), enacted in 1984, guarantees universal access to medically necessary care, yet inequities in hospital use persist. Acute length of stay (ALOS) is a key indicator of hospital efficiency, patient recovery, and healthcare system performance, with prolonged stays linked to higher costs, avoidable infections, and strain on acute care capacity. Understanding patterns in ALOS is critical not only for hospital management but also for public health, as extended stays can limit timely access to care and exacerbate population-level health inequities. Objective: This study examines social, geographic, and clinical gradients in ALOS and investigates whether the effects of admission urgency vary by sex, neighbourhood income, and rural–urban residence within a universal healthcare system. Methods: Using 2024–2025 hospital discharge data from the Canadian Institute for Health Information, this study examined ALOS as a function of comorbidity, sex, socioeconomic status, rural–urban residence (geography), and admission type (urgent versus elective). Interaction effects between admission urgency and key social and geographic variables were evaluated to assess subgroup differences in ALOS. Results: Disparities in ALOS were evident. Older age, male sex, urgent admission, and greater comorbidity were associated with longer stays, whereas higher neighbourhood income and urban residence were linked to shorter stays. Interaction analyses revealed substantial heterogeneity: compared with elective rural admissions, urgent urban admissions had 30.4% longer ALOS. Urgent admissions also amplified socioeconomic and sex-based differences, with male patients experiencing 27.9% longer stays than females. Conclusions: From a public health perspective, these findings highlight how system capacity constraints and social inequities jointly shape hospital use. Reducing avoidable variation in ALOS will require policies that strengthen acute care surge capacity, improve coordination for urgent admissions, and address upstream socioeconomic and geographic barriers to care, thereby promoting more equitable and efficient hospital services
Acute care · Comorbidity · Health care · Neighbourhood (mathematics · Public health · Public hospital · Residence · Socioeconomic status · Emergency and Acute Care Studies · Frailty in Older Adults · Sepsis Diagnosis and Treatment
| Citation velocity | historical |
|---|---|
| Highly cited | No |