Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Dissociation, Cognitive Reflection and Health Literacy Have a Modest Effect on Belief in Conspiracy Theories about Covid-19

Bibliographic Data

ID15501611
AuthorsVojtech Pisl (0000-0003-3969-468X, Charles University), Jan Volavka (0000-0002-4178-8207, Charles University), Edita Chvojková (University of Amsterdam), Kateřina Čechová (0000-0002-5845-1854, Charles University), Gabriela Kavalířová (0000-0003-1344-9598, University of West Bohemia), Jan Vevera (0000-0002-9065-1741, Charles University, corresponding author)
Year2021
Volume18
Issue10
Pages5065-5065
Publication date2021-05-11
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueInternational Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 1661-7827 • E-ISSN: 1660-4601
PublisherMultidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute (PUBLISHER • CH)
DOI10.3390/ijerph18105065
PMID34065023
OpenAlexW3161897515
LanguageEN
Citations received12
References cited36

Understanding the predictors of belief in COVID-related conspiracy theories and willingness to get vaccinated against COVID-19 may aid the resolution of current and future pandemics. We investigate how psychological and cognitive characteristics influence general conspiracy mentality and COVID-related conspiracy theories. A cross-sectional study was conducted based on data from an online survey of a sample of Czech university students ( n = 866) collected in January 2021, using multivariate linear regression and mediation analysis. Sixteen percent of respondents believed that COVID-19 is a hoax, and 17% believed that COVID-19 was intentionally created by humans. Seven percent of the variance of the hoax theory and 10% of the variance of the creation theory was explained by (in descending order of relevance) low cognitive reflection, low digital health literacy, high experience with dissociation and, to some extent, high bullshit receptivity. Belief in COVID-related conspiracy theories depended less on psychological and cognitive variables compared to conspiracy mentality (16% of the variance explained). The effect of digital health literacy on belief in COVID-related theories was moderated by cognitive reflection. Belief in conspiracy theories related to COVID-19 was influenced by experience with dissociation, cognitive reflection, digital health literacy and bullshit receptivity

2019-20 coronavirus outbreak · Cognition · Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19 · Dissociation (chemistry · Health care · Health literacy · Literacy · Pandemic · Pathology · Pedagogy · Political science · Psychiatry · Reflection (computer programming · Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2 · Chemistry · Computer Science · Medicine · Misinformation and Its Impacts · Psychology · Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment · Social Psychology · Vaccine Coverage and Hesitancy · Virology

  • Bullshitting and Bullibility – Conditions and Consequences

    John V Petrocelli, Li Yanying et al.•Social Psychology•2024

  • Do you trust the rumors? Examining the determinants of health‐related misinformation in India

    Open Access•Hansika Kapoor, Swanaya Gurjar et al.•Asian Journal Of Social Psychology•2024

  • The distinctive characteristics of bullshit

    Slobodan Ilič, Kaja Damnjanović•Thinking & Reasoning•2025

  • Exploring vaccine hesitancy

    Open Access•Loreta Cannito, Irene Ceccato et al.•Current Psychology•2024

  • Effects of Health Literacy in the Fight Against the Covid-19 Infodemic

    John W Cheng, Masaru Nishikawa•Health Communication•2022

  • Experimental manipulation of uncanny feeling does not increase adherence to conspiracy theories

    Open Access•Florent Varet, Jais Adam‐troian et al.•Scandinavian Journal of Psychology•2024

  • Association of Digital Health Literacy with Future Anxiety as Mediated by Information Satisfaction and Fear of Covid-19

    Open Access•Sheng‐Chih Chen, Lê Đức Huy et al.•International Journal of…•2022

  • Do Physical Activity, BMI, and Wellbeing Affect Logical Thinking

    Open Access•Albertas Skurvydas, Aušra Lisinskienė et al.•International Journal of…•2022

  • The effect of acute stress response on conspiracy theory beliefs

    Open Access•Vojtech Pisl, Türkay Salim Nefes et al.•Politics and the Life Sciences•2024

  • Does Mental Health Affect the Decision to Vaccinate Against Sars-CoV-2? A Cross-Sectional Nationwide Study Before the Vaccine Campaign

    Open Access•Julian Maciaszek, Marta Lenart‐Bugla et al.•Frontiers in Psychiatry•2022

  • What Types of Exercise Are Best for Emotional Intelligence and Logical Thinking

    Open Access•Albertas Skurvydas, Aušra Lisinskienė et al.•International Journal of…•2022

  • Cognitive Style Underlying Belief in a Just World

    Open Access•Laurent Bègue•Social Justice Research•2025

  • Content matters. Different predictors and social consequences of general and government-related conspiracy theories on Covid-19

    Open Access•Tomasz Oleksy, Anna Wnuk et al.•Personality and Individual…•2021

  • eHeals

    Open Access•Cameron D Norman, Harvey A Skinner•Journal of Medical Internet…•2006

  • On the reception and detection of pseudo-profound bullshit

    Open Access•Gordon Pennycook, James Allan Cheyne et al.•Judgment and Decision Making•2015

  • Welcome to the Tidyverse

    Open Access•Hadley Wickham, Mara Averick et al.•Journal of Open Source Software•2019

  • National Narcissism predicts the Belief in and the Dissemination of Conspiracy Theories During the Covid-19 Pandemic

    Open Access•Anni Sternisko, Aleksandra Cichocka et al.•Personality and Social Psychology…•2023

  • A Bioweapon or a Hoax? The Link Between Distinct Conspiracy Beliefs About the Coronavirus Disease (Covid-19) Outbreak and Pandemic Behavior

    Open Access•Roland Imhoff, Pia Lamberty•Social Psychological and…•2020

  • Someone is pulling the strings

    Karen M Douglas, Robbie M Sutton et al.•Thinking & Reasoning•2015

  • Measuring Belief in Conspiracy Theories

    Open Access•Robert Brotherton, Christopher C French et al.•Frontiers in Psychology•2013

  • Measuring Individual Differences in Generic Beliefs in Conspiracy Theories Across Cultures

    Open Access•Martin Bruder, Peter Haffke et al.•Frontiers in Psychology•2013

  • Who falls for fake news? The roles of bullshit receptivity, overclaiming, familiarity, and analytic thinking

    Open Access•Gordon Pennycook, David G Rand et al.•Journal of Personality•2020

  • Coronavirus-Related Health Literacy

    Open Access•Orkan Okan, Torsten Michael Bollweg et al.•International Journal of…•2020

  • The Determinants of Conspiracy Beliefs Related to the Covid-19 Pandemic in a Nationally Representative Sample of Internet Users

    Open Access•Mariusz Duplaga•International Journal of…•2020

  • Searching for General Model of Conspiracy Theories and Its Implication for Public Health Policy

    Open Access•Seoyong Kim, Sunhee Kim•International Journal of…•2020

  • Making sense of the meaning literature

    Crystal L Park•Psychological Bulletin•2010

  • Suspicious minds in times of crisis

    Open Access•Catalin Stoica, Cătălin Augustin Stoica et al.•European Societies•2020

  • The illusion of explanatory depth and endorsement of conspiracy beliefs

    Open Access•Joseph A Vitriol, Jessecae K Marsh•European Journal of Social…•2018

  • Understanding Conspiracy Theories

    Open Access•Karen M Douglas, Joseph E Uscinski et al.•Political Psychology•2019

  • The case for motivated reasoning

    Ziva Kunda•Psychological Bulletin•1990

  • Feeling validated versus being correct

    William Hart, Dolores Albarracin et al.•Psychological Bulletin•2009

  • Conspiracy theories as barriers to controlling the spread of Covid-19 in the U.S

    Open Access•Daniel Romer, Kathleen Hall Jamieson•Social Science & Medicine•2020

  • Cognitive Reflection and Decision Making

    Open Access•Shane Frederick•The Journal of Economic…•2005

  • Understanding and Using Mediators and Moderators

    Open Access•Amery D Wu, Bruno D Zumbo•Social Indicators Research•2008

Citations per year3
Citation span2022 - 2025 (4)
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae