Australia’s Ongoing Legacy of Asbestos

The most effective way of reducing the global burden of asbestos-related diseases is through the implementation of asbestos bans and minimising occupational and non-occupational exposure to respirable asbestos fibres. Australia's asbestos consumption peaked in the 1970s with Australia widely thought to have had among the highest per-capita asbestos consumption level of any country. Australia's discontinuation of all forms of asbestos and asbestos-containing products and materials did not occur at a single point of time. Crocidolite consumption ceased in the late 1960s, followed by amosite consumption stopping in the mid 1980s. Despite significant government reports being published in 1990 and 1999, it was not until the end of 2003 that a complete ban on all forms of asbestos (crocidolite, amosite, and chrysotile) was introduced in Australia. The sustained efforts of trade unions and non-governmental organisations were essential in forcing the Australian government to finally implement the 2003 asbestos ban. Trade unions and non-government organisations continue to play a key role today in monitoring the government's response to Australian asbestos-related disease epidemic. There are significant challenges that remain in Australia, despite a complete asbestos ban being implemented almost fifteen years ago. The Australian epidemic of asbestos-related disease has only now reached its peak. A total of 16,679 people were newly diagnosed with malignant mesothelioma between 1982 and 2016, with 84% of cases occurring in men. There has been a stabilisation of the age-standardised malignant mesothelioma incidence rate in the last 10 years. In 2016, the incidence rate per 100,000 was 2.5 using the Australian standard population and 1.3 using the Segi world standard population. Despite Australia's complete asbestos ban being in place since 2003, public health efforts must continue to focus on preventing the devastating effects of avoidable asbestos-related diseases, including occupational and non-occupational groups who are potentially at risk from exposure to respirable asbestos fibres

Asbestos · Environmental health · Geography · Political science · Medicine · Occupational and environmental lung diseases

• Global, regional and national mortality burden of laryngeal cancer attributable to occupational exposure to sulfuric acid and asbestos

  Open Access•Xin Gong, Yinxia Xu et al.•Frontiers in Public Health•2025

  Incluir item

• Asbestos awareness among the residents of St. Kitts and Nevis

  Open Access•Denrick Jeffers, Yu‐Chi Liao et al.•Globalization and Health•2022

  Incluir item

• The devolution of the social licence to operate in the Australian mining industry

  Open Access•David Laurence•The Extractive Industries and…•2020

  Incluir item

• Assessing trends and burden of occupational exposure to asbestos in the United States

  Open Access•Xujun Li, Xin Su et al.•BMC Public Health•2024

  Incluir item

• Global, regional, and national burden of non-communicable diseases attributable to occupational asbestos exposure 1990–2019 and prediction to 2035

  Open Access•Xinlu Miao, Teng Yao et al.•BMC Public Health•2024

  Incluir item

• Global, regional, and national comparative risk assessment of 84 behavioural, environmental and occupational, and metabolic risks or clusters of risks, 1990–2016

  Open Access•Emmanuela Gakidou, Ashkan Afshin et al.•The Lancet•2017

  Incluir item

• Global, regional, and national comparative risk assessment of 79 behavioural, environmental and occupational, and metabolic risks or clusters of risks, 1990–2015

  Open Access•Mohammad H Forouzanfar, Ashkan Afshin et al.•The Lancet•2016

  Incluir item

• The future excess fraction model for calculating burden of disease

  Open Access•Lin Fritschi, Jayzii Chan et al.•BMC Public Health•2016

  Incluir item