Using Co-Production to Develop “Sit Less at Work” Interventions in a Range of Organisations
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 15502005 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Kelly Mackenzie (0000-0002-1290-0079, University of Sheffield, corresponding author), E Such (0000-0003-2242-3357, University of Sheffield), Paul Norman (0000-0002-6211-1625, University of Sheffield), Elizabeth Goyder (0000-0003-3691-1888, University of Sheffield) |
| Year | 2021 |
| Volume | 18 |
| Issue | 15 |
| Pages | 7751-7751 |
| Publication date | 2021-07-22 |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 1661-7827 • E-ISSN: 1660-4601 |
| Publisher | Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute (PUBLISHER • CH) |
| DOI | 10.3390/ijerph18157751 |
| PMID | 34360045 |
| OpenAlex | W3186286020 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 2 |
| References cited | 48 |
Prolonged periods of sitting are associated with negative health outcomes, so the increase in sedentary jobs is a public health concern. Evaluation of interventions to reduce workplace sitting have suggested that participatory approaches may be more effective. This paper describes the use of co-production in four diverse organisations. Workshops with staff in each organisation were conducted to develop an organisation-specific strategy. The first workshop involved creative activities to encourage participants to develop innovative suggestions. The second workshop then developed a feasible and acceptable action plan. An ecological approach was used to consider behaviour change determinants at a range of different levels including intrapersonal, interpersonal, organisational, and environmental-level factors. 41 staff volunteered for workshops (seven in a small business, 16 in a charity, 15 in a local authority, and three in a large corporation). Of those, 27 were able to attend the first workshops and 16 were able to attend the second. Whilst there were some similarities across organisations, the smaller organisations developed a more tailored and innovative strategy than large organisations where there were more barriers to change and a more diverse workforce. Co-production resulted in bespoke interventions, tailored for different organisational contexts, maximising their potential feasibility and acceptability
Action plan · Bespoke · Business · Citizen journalism · General partnership · Interpersonal communication · Intrapersonal communication · Knowledge management · Management · Political science · Production (economics · Psychological intervention · Public relations · Work (physics · Workforce · Behavioral Health and Interventions · Engineering · Medicine · Nursing · Physical Activity and Health · Psychology · Workplace Health and Well-being
Daily Sitting Time and All-Cause Mortality
Sitting Time and Mortality from All Causes, Cardiovascular Disease, and Cancer
Adults' Sedentary Behavior
Television Viewing and Risk of Type 2 Diabetes, Cardiovascular Disease, and All-Cause Mortality
Sitting Time, Physical Activity, and Risk of Mortality in Adults
Sedentary Behavior and Depression Among Adults
Trends over 5 Decades in U.S. Occupation-Related Physical Activity and Their Associations with Obesity
Sedentary behaviour and risk of all-cause, cardiovascular and cancer mortality, and incident type 2 diabetes
Understanding the Implementation of “Sit Less at Work” Interventions in Three Organisations
Doing masculinity, not doing health? a qualitative study among dutch male employees about health beliefs and workplace physical activity
Development of a framework for the co-production and prototyping of public health interventions
Sitting less at work
Desk-based workers’ perspectives on using sit-stand workstations
Acceptability and feasibility of a low-cost, theory-based and co-produced intervention to reduce workplace sitting time in desk-based university employees
Reducing office workers’ sitting time
Motives for adult participation in physical activity
Six steps in quality intervention development (6SQuID)
| Citations per year | 0.4 |
|---|---|
| Citation span | 2021 - 2021 (1) |
| Highly cited | No |