Research on the Heterogeneity of Carbon Emissions under the Government’s Promotion of Urban Agglomeration Development
Empirical Evidence from County-to-District Reforms
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 15508301 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Jing Jin (0000-0001-9032-521X, Zhejiang University of Technology), Chen Duo-zhang (Zhejiang University of Technology, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2022 |
| Volume | 19 |
| Issue | 12 |
| Pages | 7540-7540 |
| Publication date | 2022-06-20 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 1661-7827 • E-ISSN: 1660-4601 |
| Publisher | Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute (PUBLISHER • CH) |
| DOI | 10.3390/ijerph19127540 |
| PMID | 35742788 |
| OpenAlex | W4283264106 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 1 |
| References cited | 6 |
County-to-district reform (CTDR) is an important policy path for the government to promote the cultivation and construction of urban agglomerations, and exploring its "carbon emission" effect is of great significance for the high-quality development of urban agglomerations and the realization of the "dual carbon" goal. Based on the panel data of 120 counties in the Yangtze River Delta urban agglomeration from 2000-2017, this paper empirically tests the effect of county-to-district reforms on per capita carbon emissions in the counties of the central and peripheral cities of the Yangtze River Delta urban agglomeration under the Kutznets curve (EKC) hypothesis and the integrated difference-in-difference (DID) model and STIRPAT model. The results show that: (1) The carbon emission effect of county-to-district reforms have significant regional heterogeneity. The reforms of the central city of the urban agglomeration significantly reduced the per capita carbon emission of the county by 4.27%, whereas the reforms of the periphery cities of the urban agglomeration significantly increased per capita carbon emission by 6.56%. (2) The impact of county-to-district reforms on county per capita carbon emissions began to appear in the fourth year of reform. (3) Mechanism analysis showed that county-to-district reforms promoted central cities population agglomeration and reduction of carbon emission intensity can help reduce the per capita carbon emission level in counties, whereas peripheral cities have a dual carbon-increasing effect of decreasing population density and increasing carbon emission intensity. Therefore, the approval of county-to-district reforms should be strictly controlled, and the reform of non-central cities would be especially prudent, so as to reduce the negative effect of reform on the high-quality development of cities
Business · Economic geography · Economic growth · Economics · Economies of agglomeration · Empirical evidence · Empirical research · Government (linguistics · Natural resource economics · Political science · Politics · Promotion (chess · Public economics · Urban agglomeration · Air Quality and Health Impacts · Energy, Environment, Economic Growth · Spatial and Panel Data Analysis
Urbanization and industrialization impact of CO2 emissions in China
How does technological innovation mitigate CO2 emissions in OECD countries? Heterogeneous analysis using panel quantile regression
Impact of Population Growth
The effects of urbanization and industrialization on decoupling economic growth from carbon emission – A case study of China
Can Innovation Agglomeration Reduce Carbon Emissions? Evidence from China
Spatial Analysis on the Role of Multi-Dimensional Urbanizations in Carbon Emissions
| Unique citing works | 1 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 1 |
| Citation span | 2025 - 2025 (1) |
| Citation velocity | recent |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 1 |