Natural Patterns of Sitting, Standing and Stepping During and Outside Work—Differences between Habitual Users and Non-Users of Sit–Stand Workstations
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 15512011 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Lidewij R Renaud (0000-0003-0892-4358, Amsterdam University Medical Centers), Maaike A Huysmans (0000-0002-6792-1934, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, corresponding author), Hidde P van der Ploeg (0000-0002-3719-5249, Amsterdam University Medical Centers), Erwin M Speklé (Arbo Unie), Allard J van der Beek (0000-0002-4672-9062, Amsterdam University Medical Centers) |
| Year | 2020 |
| Volume | 17 |
| Issue | 11 |
| Pages | 4075-4075 |
| Publication date | 2020-06-08 |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 1661-7827 • E-ISSN: 1660-4601 |
| Publisher | Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute (PUBLISHER • CH) |
| DOI | 10.3390/ijerph17114075 |
| PMID | 32521625 |
| OpenAlex | W3032959343 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 2 |
| References cited | 58 |
Sit-stand workstations have shown to reduce sitting time in office workers on a group level. However, movement behaviour patterns might differ between subgroups of workers. Therefore, the objective of this study was to examine sitting, standing and stepping outcomes between habitual users and non-users of sit-stand workstations. From an international office population based in the Netherlands, 24 users and 25 non-users of sit-stand workstations were included (all had long-term access to these workstations). Using the ActivPAL, sitting, standing and stepping were objectively measured during and outside working hours. Differences in outcomes between users and non-users were analysed using linear regression. During working hours, users sat less (-1.64; 95% IC= -2.27--1.01 hour/8 hour workday) and stood more (1.51; 95% IC= 0.92-2.10 hour/8 hour workday) than non-users. Attenuated but similar differences were also found for total sitting time over the whole week. Furthermore, time in static standing bouts was relatively high for users during working hours (median= 0.56; IQR = 0.19-1.08 hour/8 hour workday). During non-working hours on workdays and during non-working days, no differences were found between users and non-users. During working hours, habitual users of their sit-stand workstation sat substantially less and stood proportionally more than non-users. No differences were observed outside working hours, leading to attenuated but similar differences in total sitting and standing time between users and non-users for total days. This indicated that the users of sit-stand workstations reduced their sitting time at work, but this seemed not to be accompanied by major carry-over or compensatory effects outside working hours
Geography · Natural (archaeology · Operating system · Physical medicine and rehabilitation · Sitting · Work (physics · Workstation · Balance, Gait, and Falls Prevention · Computer Science · Engineering · Ergonomics and Musculoskeletal Disorders · Medicine · Physical Activity and Health · Psychology
Sedentary Behavior, Exercise, and Cardiovascular Health
Combined Effects of Time Spent in Physical Activity, Sedentary Behaviors and Sleep on Obesity and Cardio-Metabolic Health Markers
Dose-response associations between accelerometry measured physical activity and sedentary time and all cause mortality
Validation of Wearable Monitors for Assessing Sedentary Behavior
Sedentary Behavior and Health
Determinants of participation in worksite health promotion programmes
Health benefits of physical activity
Long-Term Access to Sit-Stand Workstations in a Large Office Population
Moderating influences of baseline activity levels in school physical activity programming for children
Breaking barriers
Evaluation of sit-stand workstations in an office setting
| Citations per year | 0.4 |
|---|---|
| Citation span | 2021 - 2023 (3) |
| Highly cited | No |