Validity of Three Survey Questions for Self-Assessed Sedentary Time
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 15515543 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Viktoria Wahlström (0000-0002-4656-7606, Umeå University, corresponding author), Mikael Nygren (Umeå University), Daniel Olsson (0000-0002-8965-4312, Umeå University), F Bergman (0000-0002-0923-5813, Umeå University), Charlotte Lewis (0000-0001-7627-0179, Umeå University) |
| Year | 2022 |
| Volume | 19 |
| Issue | 7 |
| Pages | 4269-4269 |
| Publication date | 2022-04-02 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 1661-7827 • E-ISSN: 1660-4601 |
| Publisher | Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute (PUBLISHER • CH) |
| DOI | 10.3390/ijerph19074269 |
| PMID | 35409948 |
| OpenAlex | W4223620141 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 1 |
| References cited | 14 |
Time spent in sedentary behavior (SB) has increased during the last decades. Accurate assessments are of importance when studying health consequences of SB. This study aimed to assess concurrent validity between three different questions for self-reported sitting and thigh worn accelerometer data. In total, 86 participants wore the ActivPAL accelerometer during three separate weeks, assessing sitting time with different questions each week. The questions used were Katzmarzyk, GIH stationary single-item question (SED-GIH), and a modified version of the single-item from IPAQ short form. In total 64, 57, and 55 participants provided valid accelerometer and questionnaire data at each time-point, respectively, and were included for analysis. Spearman and Pearson correlation was used to assess the validity. The three questions, Katzmarzyk, SED-GIH, and a modified question from IPAQ all showed a weak non-significant correlation to ActivPAL with r-values of 0.26, 0.25, and 0.19 respectively. For Katzmarzyk and SED-GIH, 50% and 37% reported correctly, respectively. For the modified IPAQ, 53% over-reported and 47% under-reported their sitting time. In line with previous research, our study shows poor validity for self-reported sitting-time. For future research, the use of sensor-based data on SB are of high importance
Accelerometer · Concurrent validity · Developmental psychology · Physical activity · Physical therapy · Psychometrics · sed · Sedentary behavior · Sedentary lifestyle · Sitting · Spearman's rank correlation coefficient · Statistics · Computer Science · Mathematics · Medicine · Obesity, Physical Activity, Diet · Physical Activity and Health · Psychology · Urban Transport and Accessibility · Internal Medicine
Sedentary Behavior Research Network (SBRN) – Terminology Consensus Project process and outcome
Sitting Time and Mortality from All Causes, Cardiovascular Disease, and Cancer
Validation of Wearable Monitors for Assessing Sedentary Behavior
The Effect of Social Desirability and Social Approval on Self-Reports of Physical Activity
Trends over 5 Decades in U.S. Occupation-Related Physical Activity and Their Associations with Obesity
The MOS 36-ltem Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36)
Increasing physical activity, but persisting social gaps among middle-aged people
Implementing a Physical Activity Promoting Program in a Flex-Office
Productivity, Satisfaction, Work Environment and Health after Relocation to an Activity-Based Flex Office—The Active Office Design Study
The SED-GIH
Concurrent and predictive validity of physical activity measurement items commonly used in clinical settings– data from SCAPIS pilot study
Is self-reporting workplace activity worthwhile? Validity and reliability of occupational sitting and physical activity questionnaire in desk-based workers
Application of the Occupational Sitting and Physical Activity Questionnaire (Ospaq) to office based workers
The Swedish SF-36 Health Survey-I. Evaluation of data quality, scaling assumptions, reliability and construct validity across general populations in Sweden
| Unique citing works | 1 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 0.33 |
| Citation span | 2023 - 2023 (1) |
| Citation velocity | historical |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 1 |