Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Can Water Rights Trading Scheme Promote Regional Water Conservation in China? Evidence from a Time-Varying DID Analysis

Bibliographic Data

ID15515859
AuthorsLin Fang (0009-0001-1710-8144, Huaiyin Institute of Technology, corresponding author), Fengping Wu (0000-0002-4572-3873, Hohai University)
Year2020
Volume17
Issue18
Pages6679-6679
Publication date2020-09-14
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueInternational Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 1661-7827 • E-ISSN: 1660-4601
PublisherMultidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute (PUBLISHER • CH)
DOI10.3390/ijerph17186679
PMID32937818
OpenAlexW3085557892
LanguageEN
Citations received4
References cited2

Using the panel data of 30 provinces in China from 1998 to 2017, we adopt a time-varying difference-in-differences (time-varying DID) model to estimate the impact of water rights trading scheme on regional water consumption. The results show that water rights trading can significantly promote water conservation in the pilot regions by 3.1% compared to that in the non-pilot regions, and a series of robustness tests show consistent results. Policy effects are mainly driven by improving water-use efficiency and adjusting water structure; that is, by transferring water resources from the agricultural sector to the other sectors, agricultural water efficiency is improved and water conflict among sectors is alleviated; thus, water saving is achieved. In addition, by constructing two indexes of regional water pressure and tradable water resources, our heterogeneity analysis shows that water rights trading performs better in areas with high water pressure and large tradable water resources. Under the high pressure of large water use and low water endowment, water rights trading will evidently reduce water consumption more so than in the low-pressure regions, and with water rights trading, it is hard to achieve a policy effect in regions without sufficient tradable water resources. This paper provides important policy implications for China for further promoting the water rights trading scheme in the field of resource conservation

Agriculture · Business · China · Economics · Endowment · Environmental economics · Farm water · Geography · Natural resource economics · Resource (disambiguation · Robustness (evolution · Water conservation · Water resource management · Water resources · Water trading · Water use · Computer Science · Environmental Science · Fiscal Policy and Economic Growth · Water resources management and optimization · Water-Energy-Food Nexus Studies · Ecology

  • Promoting agricultural water saving through cross–industry water rights trading in China

    Open Access•Xiaoying He, Xiaona Li et al.•Sustainable Futures•2026

  • Performance evaluation of China's agricultural water rights markets (2002–2020)

    Open Access•Xiaoping Dai, David Garrick et al.•Water Policy•2023

  • Has Central Government Environmental Protection Interview Improved Air Quality in China

    Open Access•Shanyong Wang, Rongwei Zhang et al.•Ecological Economics•2023

  • Urban land use effects of high-speed railway network in China

    Open Access•Fangqu Niu, Zhongling Xin et al.•Land Use Policy•2021

  • Can carbon emission trading scheme achieve energy conservation and emission reduction? Evidence from the industrial sector in China

    Open Access•Yucai Hu, Shenggang Ren et al.•Energy Economics•2020

Citations per year0.8
Citation span2021 - 2026 (6)
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae