Multicomponent Intervention for Patients Admitted to an Emergency Unit for Suicide Attempt
An Exploratory Study
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 15516358 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Sebastien Brovelli (University of Lausanne), Yves Dorogi (University of Lausanne), Adam-Scott Feiner (University of Lausanne), Philippe Golay (0000-0002-2273-6241, University of Lausanne), Friedrich Stiefel (0000-0003-0326-7918, University of Lausanne), Charles Bonsack (0000-0002-5512-5519, University of Lausanne), Laurent Michaud (0000-0002-2954-3848, University of Lausanne, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2017 |
| Volume | 8 |
| Pages | 188-188 |
| Publication date | 2017-09-27 |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Frontiers in Psychiatry (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 1664-0640 • E-ISSN: 1664-0640 |
| Publisher | Frontiers Media (PUBLISHER • CH) |
| DOI | 10.3389/fpsyt.2017.00188 |
| PMID | 29021764 |
| OpenAlex | W2758958382 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 1 |
| References cited | 57 |
Suicide is a major cause of premature deaths worldwide and belongs to the top priority public health issues. While suicide attempt is the most important risk factor for completed suicide, intervention for suicide attempters (SA) have produced mixed results. Since an important proportion of SA request medical care, emergency units (EU) are an opportune setting to implement such interventions. This exploratory study evaluated the feasibility and acceptability of a multicomponent intervention for SA admitted to an EU. The intervention consisted of coordination by a case manager of a joint crisis plan (JCP), an early meeting with relatives and the existing care network, as well as phone contacts during 3 months after suicide attempt. Among 107 SA admitted to the emergency unit during the study period, 51 could not be included for logistical reason, 22 were excluded, and intervention was offered to 34. Of these, 15 refused the intervention, which was thus piloted with 19 SA. First-time attempters most frequently declined the intervention. Feasibility and acceptability of phone contacts and case manager were good, while JCPs and meetings were difficult to implement and perceived as less acceptable. Refusal pattern questions the global acceptability and is discussed: JCPs and meetings will have to be modified in order to improve their feasibility and acceptability, especially among first-time attempters
Brief intervention · Crisis intervention · Exploratory research · Intervention (counseling · Medical emergency · Phone · Poison control · Psychiatry · Psychological intervention · Suicide attempt · Suicide prevention · Unit (ring theory · Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development · Medicine · Mental Health Treatment and Access · Psychology · Suicide and Self-Harm Studies
Rebuilding the Tower of Babel
Suicide as an outcome for mental disorders
Fatal and non-fatal repetition of self-harm
Rebuilding the Tower of Babel
Disability-adjusted life years (Dalys) for 291 diseases and injuries in 21 regions, 1990–2010
Completed Suicide After a Suicide Attempt
Assessment of client/patient satisfaction
Suicide Prevention Strategies
The measurement of pessimism
Psychiatric Diagnoses and Comorbidity in Relation to Suicidal Behavior Among Psychiatrically Hospitalized Adolescents
| Citations per year | 0.33 |
|---|---|
| Citation span | 2023 - 2023 (1) |
| Highly cited | No |