Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Clinical Utility of Machine-Learning Approaches in Schizophrenia

Improving Diagnostic Confidence for Translational Neuroimaging

Bibliographic Data

ID15518320
AuthorsSarina J Iwabuchi (0000-0002-7034-7128, University of Nottingham, corresponding author), Peter F Liddle (0000-0001-6473-7640, University of Nottingham), Lena Palaniyappan (0000-0003-1640-7182, University of Nottingham)
Year2013
Volume4
Pages95-95
Publication date2013-01-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueFrontiers in Psychiatry (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 1664-0640 • E-ISSN: 1664-0640
PublisherFrontiers Media (PUBLISHER • CH)
DOI10.3389/fpsyt.2013.00095
PMID24009589
PMCIDPMC3756305
OpenAlexW2090775736
LanguageEN
Citations received2
References cited3

Machine-learning approaches are becoming commonplace in the neuroimaging literature as potential diagnostic and prognostic tools for the study of clinical populations. However, very few studies provide clinically informative measures to aid in decision-making and resource allocation. Head-to-head comparison of neuroimaging-based multivariate classifiers is an essential first step to promote translation of these tools to clinical practice. We systematically evaluated the classifier performance using back-to-back structural MRI in two field strengths (3- and 7-T) to discriminate patients with schizophrenia (n = 19) from healthy controls (n = 20). Gray matter (GM) and white matter images were used as inputs into a support vector machine to classify patients and control subjects. Seven Tesla classifiers outperformed the 3-T classifiers with accuracy reaching as high as 77% for the 7-T GM classifier compared to 66.6% for the 3-T GM classifier. Furthermore, diagnostic odds ratio (a measure that is not affected by variations in sample characteristics) and number needed to predict (a measure based on Bayesian certainty of a test result) indicated superior performance of the 7-T classifiers, whereby for each correct diagnosis made, the number of patients that need to be examined using the 7-T GM classifier was one less than the number that need to be examined if a different classifier was used. Using a hypothetical example, we highlight how these findings could have significant implications for clinical decision-making. We encourage the reporting of measures proposed here in future studies utilizing machine-learning approaches. This will not only promote the search for an optimum diagnostic tool but also aid in the translation of neuroimaging to clinical use

Classifier (UML · Machine learning · Neuroimaging · Psychiatry · Support vector machine · Advanced Neuroimaging Techniques and Applications · Cell Image Analysis Techniques · Computer Science · Functional Brain Connectivity Studies · Medicine · Artificial Intelligence

  • Development of an Al-Based Web Diagnostic System for Phenotyping Psychiatric Disorders

    Open Access•Yu-Wei Chang, Shih‐Jen Tsai et al.•Frontiers in Psychiatry•2020

  • Detecting Neuroimaging Biomarkers for Psychiatric Disorders

    Open Access•Hugo G Schnack, René S Kahn•Frontiers in Psychiatry•2016

  • A fast diffeomorphic image registration algorithm

    Open Access•John Ashburner•NeuroImage•2007

  • Using Multivariate Machine Learning Methods and Structural MRI to Classify Childhood Onset Schizophrenia and Healthy Controls

    Open Access•Deanna Greenstein, James D Malley et al.•Frontiers in Psychiatry•2012

  • The Quick Test (QT)

    Open Access•R B Ammons, C H Ammons•Psychological Reports•1962

Unique citing works2
Citations per year0,2
Citation span2016 - 2020 (5)
Citation velocityhistorical
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 2

Tools

Open DOISci-HubOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae