Minimizing policy-biased appraisals of the evidence on cannabis and psychosis
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 15518932 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Wendy Hall (0000-0003-1984-0096, The University of Queensland, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2023 |
| Volume | 13 |
| Pages | 1047860-1047860 |
| Publication date | 2023-01-09 |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Frontiers in Psychiatry (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 1664-0640 • E-ISSN: 1664-0640 |
| Publisher | Frontiers Media (PUBLISHER • CH) |
| DOI | 10.3389/fpsyt.2022.1047860 |
| PMID | 36699475 |
| OpenAlex | W4313890271 |
| Language | EN |
| References cited | 37 |
Appraisals of the evidence on the relationship between cannabis use and psychosis are often biased by appraisers' pre-existing views on whether adult cannabis use should or should not be legal. This viewpoint gives examples of such policy-biased appraisals and suggests strategies for avoiding them
Cannabis · Effects of cannabis · Psychiatry · Psychosis · Cannabis and Cannabinoid Research · Prenatal Substance Exposure Effects · Psychology · Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes
Public health implications of legalising the production and sale of cannabis for medicinal and recreational use
Meta-analysis of the Association Between the Level of Cannabis Use and Risk of Psychosis
Cannabis use and risk of psychotic or affective mental health outcomes
An Experimental Study of the Etiology of “Rum Fits” and Delirium Tremens
Against Excess
Developing Public Health Regulations for Marijuana
| Highly cited | No |
|---|