What Works for Whom
Patients' Psychological Resources and Vulnerabilities as Common and Specific Predictors of Working Alliance in Different Psychotherapies
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 15519059 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Erkki Heinonen (0000-0001-8846-8983, University of Helsinki, corresponding author), Paul Knekt (0000-0002-2648-1338, Finnish Institute for Health and Welfare), Olavi Lindfors (0000-0002-7930-794X, Finnish Institute for Health and Welfare) |
| Year | 2022 |
| Volume | 13 |
| Pages | 848408-848408 |
| Publication date | 2022-07-05 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Frontiers in Psychiatry (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 1664-0640 • E-ISSN: 1664-0640 |
| Publisher | Frontiers Media (PUBLISHER • CH) |
| DOI | 10.3389/fpsyt.2022.848408 |
| PMID | 35865305 |
| OpenAlex | W4284678871 |
| Language | EN |
| References cited | 61 |
Although patients with certain qualities achieve better alliances in long-term as opposed to short-term therapies, apparently the theoretical orientation of therapy makes little difference. For patients with childhood adversities, differences between long-term (psychodynamic) treatment vs. various brief therapy models may be particularly salient
Alliance · Political science · Psychiatry · Psychotherapist · Attachment and Relationship Dynamics · Clinical Psychology · Personality Disorders and Psychopathology · Psychology · Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications
The Role of Common Factors in Psychotherapy Outcomes
Interpersonal Processes in Depression
Optimism
A Review and Meta-Analysis of the Genetic Epidemiology of Anxiety Disorders
The generalizability of the psychoanalytic concept of the working alliance.
Personality and Depression
Development and validation of the Working Alliance Inventory.
The alliance in adult psychotherapy
Childhood Maltreatment Predicts Unfavorable Course of Illness and Treatment Outcome in Depression
Reflective functioning
Optimism, coping, and health
A Rating Scale for Depression
The Assessment of Anxiety States by Rating
| Citation velocity | historical |
|---|---|
| Highly cited | No |