Evaluating the efficacy of three classical EEG paradigms in the discrimination of bipolar depression

Datos Bibliográficos

ID15519603
AutoresChen Yang (0000-0002-4801-4036, Fifth Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University), Yao Pi (0009-0006-2385-2515, Sun Yat-sen University), Weijie Wang (0000-0001-6997-5752, Sun Yat-sen University), Ying Huang (0000-0003-3569-7576, Fifth Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University), Nan Tang (0000-0001-9702-8402, Shenzhen Maternity and Child Healthcare Hospital), Hong Wang (0000-0003-2405-7311, Sun Yat-sen University, autor de correspondencia), Shenglin Wen (Fifth Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, autor de correspondencia)
Año2025
Volumen16
Páginas1545132-1545132
Fecha de publicación2025-05-29
Peer ReviewedSí
Open AccessSí
TipoARTICLE
RevistaFrontiers in Psychiatry (JOURNAL)
Identificadores de la revistaISSN: 1664-0640 • E-ISSN: 1664-0640
EditorialFrontiers Media (PUBLISHER • CH)
DOI10.3389/fpsyt.2025.1545132
PMID40511454
OpenAlexW4410856737
IdiomaEN
Referencias citadas67

This study indicates that the eyes closed experimental paradigm more effectively demonstrates the electrophysiological disparities between patients with BD and HCs, in comparison to the eyes open paradigm and the action observation-based free viewing paradigms, as determined through the analysis of various outcome metrics

Bipolar disorder · Cognitive psychology · Depression (economics · Electroencephalography · Mood · Psychiatry · Bipolar Disorder and Treatment · Clinical Psychology · Functional Brain Connectivity Studies · Mental Health Research Topics · Psychology