Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Physician-assisted suicide in Italy

Where do we stand and where do we want to go

Bibliographic Data

ID15528345
AuthorsEmanuela Turillazzi (0000-0002-4067-542X, University of Pisa, corresponding author), Donato Morena (0000-0001-6473-7632, Sapienza University of Rome), Naomi Iacoponi (0009-0005-3928-7509, University of Pisa), Vittorio Fineschi (0000-0002-1686-3236, Sapienza University of Rome, corresponding author)
Year2025
Volume16
Pages1606036-1606036
Publication date2025-07-09
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueFrontiers in Psychiatry (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 1664-0640 • E-ISSN: 1664-0640
PublisherFrontiers Media (PUBLISHER • CH)
DOI10.3389/fpsyt.2025.1606036
PMID40704032
OpenAlexW4412140302
LanguageEN
References cited13

Physician-assisted suicide (PAS) remains a subject of global debate and ethical controversy, alongside other end-of-life issues such as euthanasia, palliative care, access to health and social care services, and, importantly, patient autonomy. Within this context, PAS is defined as the practice in which a physician, at the explicit request of a competent patient, prescribes a lethal medication that the patient may self-administer to end their own life. This definition clearly distinguishes PAS from euthanasia, wherein the physician directly administers the life-ending drug. Despite ongoing efforts to establish a unified definition, significant variability remains across jurisdictions with regard to eligibility criteria, procedural safeguards, and the overarching legal and ethical frameworks governing PAS. In Italy, there is currently no effective legislation regulating euthanasia or PAS, which remain practices punishable under Articles 579 (homicide of a consenting person) and 580 (instigation or assistance in suicide) of the Italian Criminal Code. The Tuscany Region has prepared a regulatory attempt at the regional level, which has, however, limited itself to proposing an operational protocol that distinguishes the operational responsibilities that the PAS procedure applicant will face. However, following several relevant cases that profoundly influenced the Italian debate, significant attention has been directed toward end-of-life issues

Assisted suicide · Autonomy · Context (archaeology · End-of-life care · Health care · Homicide · Legislation · Medical emergency · Palliative care · Poison control · Political science · Psychiatry · Suicide prevention · Ethics in medical practice · Healthcare Decision-Making and Restraints · Law · Medical Malpractice and Liability Issues · Medicine · Nursing · Psychology

  • The Nature of Suffering and the Goals of Medicine

    Eric J Cassel•New England Journal of Medicine•1982

  • Perceived Burdensomeness and the Wish for Hastened Death in Persons With Severe and Persistent Mental Illness

    Open Access•Júlia Stoll, Christopher Ryan et al.•Frontiers in Psychiatry•2021

  • A conceptual framework for thinking about physician-assisted death for persons with a mental disorder

    Catherine S Shaffer, Alana N Cook et al.•Psychology Public Policy and Law•2016

  • Data and Trends in Assisted Suicide and Euthanasia, and Some Related Demographic Issues

    Open Access•Asher D Colombo, Gianpiero Dalla‐zuanna•Population and Development Review•2024

Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae