Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Accumulation of evidence during decision making in OCD patients

Bibliographic Data

ID15528501
AuthorsYilin Chen (0000-0002-5668-7652, Center for Excellence in Brain Science and Intelligence Technology), Ying Liu (0000-0001-5584-7805, Shanghai Mental Health Center), Zhen Wang (0000-0001-6729-2640, Shanghai Jiao Tong University), Tianming Yang (0000-0001-6976-9246, Center for Excellence in Brain Science and Intelligence Technology, corresponding author), Qing Fan (0000-0002-0384-2030, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, corresponding author)
Year2022
Volume13
Pages980905-980905
Publication date2022-09-23
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueFrontiers in Psychiatry (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 1664-0640 • E-ISSN: 1664-0640
PublisherFrontiers Media (PUBLISHER • CH)
DOI10.3389/fpsyt.2022.980905
PMID36213896
OpenAlexW4296827041
LanguageEN
References cited6

Decision-making often entails the accumulation of evidence. Previous studies suggested that people with obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) process decision-making differently from healthy controls. Both their compulsive behavior and obsessive thoughts may influence the evidence accumulation process, yet the previous studies disagreed on the reason. To address this question, we employed a probabilistic reasoning task in which subjects made two alternative forced choices by viewing a series of visual stimuli. These stimuli carried probabilistic information toward the choices. While the OCD patients achieved similar accuracy to the control, they took longer time and accumulated more evidence, especially in difficult trials in which the evidence strength was low. We further modeled the subjects' decision making as a leaky drifting diffusion process toward two collapsing bounds. The control group showed a higher drifting rate than the OCD group, indicating that the OCD group was less sensitive to evidence. Together, these results demonstrated that the OCD patients were less efficient than the control at transforming sensory information into evidence. However, their evidence accumulation was comparable to the healthy control, and they compensated for their decision-making accuracy with longer reaction times

Cognitive psychology · Control (management · Obsessive compulsive · Probabilistic logic · Task (project management · Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes · Clinical Psychology · Computer Science · Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies · Obsessive-Compulsive Spectrum Disorders · Psychology · Artificial Intelligence

  • Obsessional-compulsive problems

    Open Access•Paul M Salkovskis•Behaviour Research and Therapy•1985

  • The Diffusion Decision Model

    Roger Ratcliff, Gail Mckoon•Neural Computation•2008

  • A theory of memory retrieval.

    Roger Ratcliff•Psychological Review•1978

  • The Assessment of Anxiety States by Rating

    Open Access•MAX HAMILTON•British Journal of Medical…•1959

Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae